| Re: generic ddl generator patch [message #21275] |
Fri, 08 September 2006 11:36  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: francine.grimmer.ncr.com
As long as you are looking at the DDL Generator, I would like to ask about
adding methods allowing users to set the options. Currently there are only
methods to getOptions. This would allow users to set whether they want to
include fully qualified names. Again, allowing the tools to use the
generic interface and not have to have a vendor specific DDL generator. Or
is this done someplace else that I am missing?
thanks,
-Francine Grimmer
|
|
|
| Re: generic ddl generator patch [message #21641 is a reply to message #21275] |
Wed, 20 September 2006 02:51  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: hcao.sybase.com
Hi Francine,
I'm not the person who designed the DDL Generator API, but you can look
into SQLObjectItem for an example.
Max (Hui) Cao
"Francine Grimmer" <francine.grimmer@ncr.com> wrote in message
news:a83986c4713a3cffb871cfc81c957ce2$1@www.eclipse.org...
> As long as you are looking at the DDL Generator, I would like to ask about
> adding methods allowing users to set the options. Currently there are only
> methods to getOptions. This would allow users to set whether they want to
> include fully qualified names. Again, allowing the tools to use the
> generic interface and not have to have a vendor specific DDL generator. Or
> is this done someplace else that I am missing?
>
> thanks,
> -Francine Grimmer
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: generic ddl generator patch [message #582348 is a reply to message #21275] |
Wed, 20 September 2006 02:51 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Francine,
I'm not the person who designed the DDL Generator API, but you can look
into SQLObjectItem for an example.
Max (Hui) Cao
"Francine Grimmer" <francine.grimmer@ncr.com> wrote in message
news:a83986c4713a3cffb871cfc81c957ce2$1@www.eclipse.org...
> As long as you are looking at the DDL Generator, I would like to ask about
> adding methods allowing users to set the options. Currently there are only
> methods to getOptions. This would allow users to set whether they want to
> include fully qualified names. Again, allowing the tools to use the
> generic interface and not have to have a vendor specific DDL generator. Or
> is this done someplace else that I am missing?
>
> thanks,
> -Francine Grimmer
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03672 seconds
Home