| April 30 Summary of Web Tools Project Proposal Feedback [message #20858] |
Fri, 30 April 2004 21:09 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
(As part of the membership-at-large comment process, I will be summarizing
the discussions and feedback at the end of each week: April 30, May 7, May
14, May 21, and May 27. This is the first of those summaries. I invite you
to correct any errors I have made.)
Features requested:
hibernate - Haris Peco <snpe@snpe.co.yu>
JSF - Haris Peco <snpe@snpe.co.yu>
JSP - Ivar Vasara <ivasara-NOSPAM-@cbc.ca>
portlets - Mohamed ZERGAOUI <mozer@netcourrier.com>
spring - Haris Peco <snpe@snpe.co.yu>
xdoclet - redmark <redpowerhot@hotmail.com>
Critiques:
"Spending a bunch of time making a perfect solution doesn't make sense
to me; don't want a new set of frameworks when a good starting point
exists" - Michael Dickson <mike.dickson@earthlink.net>
Scope questions:
"Should doclets be a technology project or JSR annotations in the J2EE
project?" - Naci Dai <naci.dai@eteration.com>
"Both doclets and 1.5 metadata are standards; how to coordinate the
two?" - Thomas Hallgren <thomas.hallgren@frameworx.com>
Statements of scoping:
"The scope of web tools is huge and we have chosen to start with
something well identified" - Christophe Ney <christophe.ney@objectweb.org>
"Do not commit to xdoclet at this point" - Thomas Hallgren
<thomas.hallgren@frameworx.com>
A couple people have expressed mild interest in becoming a contributor and
one person stated that "you'd likely get many hands to help whip everything
into shape", but no commitments have been made.
- WTP Proposal Shepherd (Bjorn Freeman-Benson)
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03161 seconds
Home