|
| Re: build without make? [message #211558 is a reply to message #211473] |
Mon, 10 March 2008 16:23   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dschaefer.rogers.com
Cameron Taggart wrote:
> I'm taking embedded courses in school and we are using CDT. I come from
> a Java background and I find using 'make' to be a pain. Has anyone
> looked at skipping make altogether to do builds. Does gcc expose a
> compiler api that could be used from JNA? Or could the command line be
> wrapped?
>
> wdyt?
>
> Cameron
Have you tried managed builds? In CDT 4.0, if you create an Executable
project, it'll build automatically without Makefiles. If are in CDT 3.x,
create a Managed Builder project.
Cheers,
Doug.
|
|
|
|
| Re: build without make? [message #211580 is a reply to message #211572] |
Mon, 10 March 2008 18:51 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dschaefer.rogers.com
Cameron Taggart wrote:
> Yes, I'm using CDT 4 and I have tried using the Managed Builder
> briefly. My understanding is that it produces and runs makefiles that
> it manages. Is that not correct? Does it run the compiler/linker
> directly?
>
> Cameron
>
> Doug Schaefer wrote:
>> Cameron Taggart wrote:
>>> I'm taking embedded courses in school and we are using CDT. I come
>>> from a Java background and I find using 'make' to be a pain. Has
>>> anyone looked at skipping make altogether to do builds. Does gcc
>>> expose a compiler api that could be used from JNA? Or could the
>>> command line be wrapped?
>>>
>>> wdyt?
>>>
>>> Cameron
>>
>> Have you tried managed builds? In CDT 4.0, if you create an Executable
>> project, it'll build automatically without Makefiles. If are in CDT
>> 3.x, create a Managed Builder project.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doug.
Depends on the toolchain. But either way, it is hidden from you.
DOug.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04052 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
