|
Re: Installing on Vista [message #209647 is a reply to message #209639] |
Tue, 08 May 2007 20:48 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
Roger,
I think 3.3 is addressing the issue of supporting Vista, so you'd likely
have better luck with 3.3M7. I'm not sure if it supports the 64 bit
version though.
I recently got a new personal machine with Vista on it and I thought I'd
died and gone to hell. It seems so incredibly slow, even though the
machine is a super good one. Never once have I been tempted to say wow,
except of course for wow, it sure boots slow, and wow, I sure have to
reboot a lot of times to upgrade all the installed drivers, but I don't
think that's the kind of wow factor they advertise. I've not tried
Eclipse on it yet, since now the machine is failing with video memory
problems and needs servicing. Wow indeed...
Roger Nye wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to install Eclipse to run RCP applications on Windows
> Vista (64-bit) with little success.
>
> Is there a version which works?
>
> So far I have tried the 3.2.2 win32 release, 3.2.1 x86-64 and 3.3M7
> win32 WPF.
>
> I have also tried running it with the Sun JDK for AMD64 and Win32.
>
> Each time it fails to load bundles due to SWTError, although regular
> Java programs run well.
>
> Any suggestions - has anyone got a particular combination to work?
>
> Thanks
> Roger
>
|
|
|
|
Re: Installing on Vista [message #209724 is a reply to message #209639] |
Wed, 09 May 2007 01:09 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eclipse5.rizzoweb.com
Roger Nye wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to install Eclipse to run RCP applications on Windows Vista
> (64-bit) with little success.
>
> Is there a version which works?
>
> So far I have tried the 3.2.2 win32 release, 3.2.1 x86-64 and 3.3M7
> win32 WPF.
>
> I have also tried running it with the Sun JDK for AMD64 and Win32.
>
> Each time it fails to load bundles due to SWTError, although regular
> Java programs run well.
>
> Any suggestions - has anyone got a particular combination to work?
Try posting the exact error(s) you're getting. Googling for some of the
text in them might be faster than waiting for a reply here ;-)
Eric
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.07627 seconds