|
| Re: WTP Architecture Group -- Request for Information [message #202824 is a reply to message #202815] |
Mon, 22 October 2007 19:47  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
Cam,
I'm very encouraged to see this note. Thanks for listening to the
community!
Cameron Bateman wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> In the WTP Architecture Group, we are trying to catalog all
> outstanding packaging issues in WTP. This includes all known issues
> and bugs that have been documented against components that relate to
> the way components are bundled.
>
> More specifically, we are looking for known issues related to:
>
> 1) Components being bundled in such a way that users/adopters are
> forced to use a dependency that they do not want or think they need.
> For example, to use plugin X you must use plugin Y, but the
> dependencies in plugin Y are rarely or never needed to actually use
> needed functionality in plugin X.
>
> 2) Functionality requiring the use of dependencies that users/adopters
> don't want. For example, there are a number of features in JSF tools
> that require a dynamic web project facet, however we have had several
> requests from people to use these features in only a Java
> natured/faceted project.
>
>
> Please send pointers to these use cases (preferably as Bugzilla
> entries) to me (cameron dot bateman at oracle.com) and I will catalog
> and publish them on the WTP architecture wiki.
>
> The catalog will be used by the architecture group to drive the
> creation of proposals for how WTP components may be rebundled and/or
> refactored to maximize their use by users/adopters who may not wish to
> adopt the entire WTP component set.
>
> --Cam
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02600 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
