Git vs Http protocol [message #1357] |
Sat, 04 April 2009 19:14 ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Solstice/images/down.png) |
Eclipse User![Friend of Eclipse Friend](/donate/web-api/friends_decorator.php?email=) |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: alex_blewitt.yahoo.com
I tried to download EGit with "git clone git://repo.or.cz/egit.git" but
firewall problems appear to be blocking the git port (9418?). Apparently,
git can work over HTTP as well (which was one of the selling points over
SVN for authenticated access) but when I tried to do " git clone
http://repo.or.cz/egit.git" I got a 'Cannot get remote repository
information' message. Is that because the 'repo.or.cz' server hasn't been
set up to provide the Git repo over HTTP as well?
Alex
|
|
|
|
Re: Git vs Http protocol [message #1405 is a reply to message #1374] |
Tue, 07 April 2009 07:51 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Solstice/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Solstice/images/down.png) |
Eclipse User![Friend of Eclipse Friend](/donate/web-api/friends_decorator.php?email=) |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: alex_blewitt.yahoo.com
OK, thanks. In general, other VCS use the same path regardless of protocol
(c.f. CVS's pserver vs ssh). It would be good if, when setting up
git.eclipse.org, we could ensure that we have the same path for both git::
and http:: access. Given that the git.eclipse.org will probably be a
vserver on the back end, and we can probably reserve the full path name
for just git repository access, I hope that it's not going to be a problem.
Alex
|
|
|
Re: Git vs Http protocol [message #1415 is a reply to message #1405] |
Tue, 07 April 2009 18:19 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Solstice/images/up.png) |
Shawn O. Pearce![Friend of Eclipse Friend](/donate/web-api/friends_decorator.php?email=spearce%40spearce.org) Messages: 82 Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Alex Blewitt wrote:
> OK, thanks. In general, other VCS use the same path regardless of
> protocol (c.f. CVS's pserver vs ssh). It would be good if, when setting
> up git.eclipse.org, we could ensure that we have the same path for both
> git:: and http:: access. Given that the git.eclipse.org will probably be
> a vserver on the back end, and we can probably reserve the full path
> name for just git repository access, I hope that it's not going to be a
> problem.
Yea, I agree.
repo.or.cz is a quirk; its a dedicated hosting site that pretty much
*only* runs git repositories for open source projects, and yet it is
configured to use different paths for git://, ssh:// and http://.
Its possible to use the same path for everything, and any
git.eclipse.org server should certainly do that.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Git vs Http protocol [message #570626 is a reply to message #1405] |
Tue, 07 April 2009 18:19 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Solstice/images/up.png) |
Shawn O. Pearce![Friend of Eclipse Friend](/donate/web-api/friends_decorator.php?email=spearce%40spearce.org) Messages: 82 Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Alex Blewitt wrote:
> OK, thanks. In general, other VCS use the same path regardless of
> protocol (c.f. CVS's pserver vs ssh). It would be good if, when setting
> up git.eclipse.org, we could ensure that we have the same path for both
> git:: and http:: access. Given that the git.eclipse.org will probably be
> a vserver on the back end, and we can probably reserve the full path
> name for just git repository access, I hope that it's not going to be a
> problem.
Yea, I agree.
repo.or.cz is a quirk; its a dedicated hosting site that pretty much
*only* runs git repositories for open source projects, and yet it is
configured to use different paths for git://, ssh:// and http://.
Its possible to use the same path for everything, and any
git.eclipse.org server should certainly do that.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04382 seconds