Home » Eclipse Projects » Eclipse Platform » Does anyone know of an XML editor which works with M5
|
| Re: Does anyone know of an XML editor which works with M5 [message #161612 is a reply to message #161538] |
Tue, 25 November 2003 17:49   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: marcus.edwards.digitalsteps.com
"Colin Sampaleanu" <colinml1@exis.com> wrote in message
news:bpvupk$mni$1@eclipse.org...
> M5 seems to have broken the XMLBuddy plugin, which I was using
> successfully with M4, as some classes have been moved around. I get the
> following error:
A quick hack would be to include the line <import
plugin="org.eclipse.jface.text" export="true"/> in the '<requires>' section
of the plugin.xml file.
I've added this line to the org.eclipse.ui plugin so that any other plugin
that needs this import gets it. I've not experienced any problems with my M5
installation as a result of making this hack.
HTH,
Marcus
|
|
|
| Re: Does anyone know of an XML editor which works with M5 [message #161644 is a reply to message #161538] |
Tue, 25 November 2003 18:39 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: jgangemi.yahoo.com
you can fix the xmlbuddy plugin yourself by quickly editting the plugin.xml
file.
under the "requires" xml tag, just add the following line:
<import plugin="org.eclipse.jface.text"/>
-jae
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:10:34 -0500, Colin Sampaleanu <colinml1@exis.com> wrote:
>M5 seems to have broken the XMLBuddy plugin, which I was using
>successfully with M4, as some classes have been moved around. I get the
>following error:
>
> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:org/eclipse/jface/text/BadLoc ationException
>
>This is actually the same error I get from another plugin, Spindle,
>which worked fine with M4.
>
>The SolarEclipse XML editor also does not seem to work any longer in M5.
>
>Does anybody know of a solution for editing XML with M5?
>
>Regards,
>Colin
|
|
| |
| Re: Does anyone know of an XML editor which works with M5 [message #161797 is a reply to message #161612] |
Tue, 25 November 2003 20:39 |
 Colin Sampaleanu
Messages: 22
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Marcus Edwards wrote:
> "Colin Sampaleanu" <colinml1@exis.com> wrote in message
> news:bpvupk$mni$1@eclipse.org...
>
>>M5 seems to have broken the XMLBuddy plugin, which I was using
>>successfully with M4, as some classes have been moved around. I get the
>>following error:
>
>
> A quick hack would be to include the line <import
> plugin="org.eclipse.jface.text" export="true"/> in the '<requires>' section
> of the plugin.xml file.
> I've added this line to the org.eclipse.ui plugin so that any other plugin
> that needs this import gets it. I've not experienced any problems with my M5
> installation as a result of making this hack.
For XmlBuddy I was able to modify xmlbuddy itself to add this
requirement as suggested by another poster (as opposed to modifying
org.eclipse.ui).
However, to get another plugin going, which has a bunch of internal
plugins, I did modify org.eclipse.ui like this, as it was a lot less
work, and all seems to be fine.
I am wondering however if anybody knows the performance implications of
doing this? I presume that any time org.eclipse.ui is brought in, so
will org.eclipse.jface.text. What is the classloading setup w/regards to
loading plugins. If org.eclipse.jface.text is requested by x different
plugins, is a new classloader (and hence a copy of the classes) created
for each importation, or only each importation of a specific version?
Regards,
Colin
|
|
|
| Re: Does anyone know of an XML editor which works with M5 [message #162227 is a reply to message #161644] |
Wed, 26 November 2003 14:42 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: bob.objfac.com
Really? This is kind of embarrassing, if true. It didn't work for me. The
next error I see has to do with openEditor(), which was both moved and
changed in M5.
Bob
http://xmlbuddy.com/
"jae" <jgangemi@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1d87sv448l85jhtrln1rcpfm0a67ot05jr@4ax.com...
>
> you can fix the xmlbuddy plugin yourself by quickly editting the
plugin.xml
> file.
>
> under the "requires" xml tag, just add the following line:
>
> <import plugin="org.eclipse.jface.text"/>
>
> -jae
>
>
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:10:34 -0500, Colin Sampaleanu <colinml1@exis.com>
wrote:
>
> >M5 seems to have broken the XMLBuddy plugin, which I was using
> >successfully with M4, as some classes have been moved around. I get the
> >following error:
> >
> >
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:org/eclipse/jface/text/BadLoc ationException
> >
> >This is actually the same error I get from another plugin, Spindle,
> >which worked fine with M4.
> >
> >The SolarEclipse XML editor also does not seem to work any longer in M5.
> >
> >Does anybody know of a solution for editing XML with M5?
> >
> >Regards,
> >Colin
>
|
|
|
| Re: Does anyone know of an XML editor which works with M5 [message #162260 is a reply to message #161797] |
Wed, 26 November 2003 15:04 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: bob.objfac.com
"Colin Sampaleanu" <colinml1@exis.com> wrote in message
news:3FC3BE0A.8030800@exis.com...
> Marcus Edwards wrote:
> > "Colin Sampaleanu" <colinml1@exis.com> wrote in message
> > news:bpvupk$mni$1@eclipse.org...
> >
> >>M5 seems to have broken the XMLBuddy plugin, which I was using
> >>successfully with M4, as some classes have been moved around. I get the
> >>following error:
> >
> >
> > A quick hack would be to include the line <import
> > plugin="org.eclipse.jface.text" export="true"/> in the '<requires>'
section
> > of the plugin.xml file.
> > I've added this line to the org.eclipse.ui plugin so that any other
plugin
> > that needs this import gets it. I've not experienced any problems with
my M5
> > installation as a result of making this hack.
>
> For XmlBuddy I was able to modify xmlbuddy itself to add this
> requirement as suggested by another poster (as opposed to modifying
> org.eclipse.ui).
And here I was thinking this would be hard. ;-}
No, seriously. You can open an XML file and edit it with this patch, but you
can't create a new one using the wizard. The openEditor() method used by the
wizard not only moved to a new class but it changed arguments. Also, there's
the "strange cursor" problem, etc.
It will take me a couple of days to sort this out. If you can limp along
with the workaround for a bit, that would be great. Otherwise, send me mail
to bugs at xmlbuddy dot com so I will be sure to let you know when this is
fixed. That goes for everyone affected.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Bob Foster
http://xmlbuddy.com/
>
> However, to get another plugin going, which has a bunch of internal
> plugins, I did modify org.eclipse.ui like this, as it was a lot less
> work, and all seems to be fine.
>
> I am wondering however if anybody knows the performance implications of
> doing this? I presume that any time org.eclipse.ui is brought in, so
> will org.eclipse.jface.text. What is the classloading setup w/regards to
> loading plugins. If org.eclipse.jface.text is requested by x different
> plugins, is a new classloader (and hence a copy of the classes) created
> for each importation, or only each importation of a specific version?
>
> Regards,
> Colin
>
|
|
|
| Re: Does anyone know of an XML editor which works with M5 [message #162289 is a reply to message #162260] |
Wed, 26 November 2003 15:52 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: jgangemi.yahoo.com
ahh - i didn't realize that the wizards didn't work (i don't use them).
i would recommend looking at the porting guide
Help->Help Contents->Platform Plugin Dev Guide->Porting
it details out what changed and moved to where, so you should be able to
resolve these issues rather quickly.
a quick glance suggests that you would need to import org.eclipse.ui.editor,
but since i'm not 100% sure of the underlying impl, there may be more you need
to add.
scroll down to the 2nd table and you should find what you're looking for.
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:04:27 -0600, "Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com> wrote:
>
>"Colin Sampaleanu" <colinml1@exis.com> wrote in message
>news:3FC3BE0A.8030800@exis.com...
>> Marcus Edwards wrote:
>> > "Colin Sampaleanu" <colinml1@exis.com> wrote in message
>> > news:bpvupk$mni$1@eclipse.org...
>> >
>> >>M5 seems to have broken the XMLBuddy plugin, which I was using
>> >>successfully with M4, as some classes have been moved around. I get the
>> >>following error:
>> >
>> >
>> > A quick hack would be to include the line <import
>> > plugin="org.eclipse.jface.text" export="true"/> in the '<requires>'
>section
>> > of the plugin.xml file.
>> > I've added this line to the org.eclipse.ui plugin so that any other
>plugin
>> > that needs this import gets it. I've not experienced any problems with
>my M5
>> > installation as a result of making this hack.
>>
>> For XmlBuddy I was able to modify xmlbuddy itself to add this
>> requirement as suggested by another poster (as opposed to modifying
>> org.eclipse.ui).
>
>And here I was thinking this would be hard. ;-}
>
>No, seriously. You can open an XML file and edit it with this patch, but you
>can't create a new one using the wizard. The openEditor() method used by the
>wizard not only moved to a new class but it changed arguments. Also, there's
>the "strange cursor" problem, etc.
>
>It will take me a couple of days to sort this out. If you can limp along
>with the workaround for a bit, that would be great. Otherwise, send me mail
>to bugs at xmlbuddy dot com so I will be sure to let you know when this is
>fixed. That goes for everyone affected.
>
>Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
>Bob Foster
>http://xmlbuddy.com/
>
>>
>> However, to get another plugin going, which has a bunch of internal
>> plugins, I did modify org.eclipse.ui like this, as it was a lot less
>> work, and all seems to be fine.
>>
>> I am wondering however if anybody knows the performance implications of
>> doing this? I presume that any time org.eclipse.ui is brought in, so
>> will org.eclipse.jface.text. What is the classloading setup w/regards to
>> loading plugins. If org.eclipse.jface.text is requested by x different
>> plugins, is a new classloader (and hence a copy of the classes) created
>> for each importation, or only each importation of a specific version?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Colin
>>
>
|
|
| |
| Re: Does anyone know of an XML editor which works with M5 [message #162587 is a reply to message #162523] |
Thu, 27 November 2003 00:48 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: bob.objfac.com
"Scott Ellsworth" <scott@alodar.com> wrote in message
news:scott-D2BDAB.14014526112003@eclipse.org...
> In article <bq2eak$ero$1@eclipse.org>, "Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It will take me a couple of days to sort this out. If you can limp along
> > with the workaround for a bit, that would be great. Otherwise, send me
mail
> > to bugs at xmlbuddy dot com so I will be sure to let you know when this
is
> > fixed. That goes for everyone affected.
>
> I note your comments that M5 is neither forward nor backwards
> compatible, and thus XmlBuddy is not targetted to it. Do you expect it
> to be locked down a bit better by M6 (Dec 19?)
I am told the release plan says that M6 will have the last breaking api
changes. At any rate, I plan to ship an M6-compatible version simultaneously
with M6 or (last-minute breakage is always possible) very shortly
thereafter. Thereafter, there will be two versions of XMLBuddy, one for
2.1.x and one for 3.0, until 3.0 ships.
Bob Foster
http://xmlbuddy.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Does anyone know of an XML editor which works with M5 [message #163049 is a reply to message #161797] |
Thu, 27 November 2003 18:37 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: John_Arthorne.oti.com_
Each plugin has its own classloader, and all code in that plugin is only
every loaded by that single classloader. So no, adding imports has no
effect on the number of loaded copies of a class. Adding unused plugin
imports actually introduces a small performance hit on classloading,
because that pre-requisite will be searched when looking for classes.
However, this hit is quite small (you probably won't be able to detect
it with a profiling tool).
--
Colin Sampaleanu wrote:
> I am wondering however if anybody knows the performance implications of
> doing this? I presume that any time org.eclipse.ui is brought in, so
> will org.eclipse.jface.text. What is the classloading setup w/regards to
> loading plugins. If org.eclipse.jface.text is requested by x different
> plugins, is a new classloader (and hence a copy of the classes) created
> for each importation, or only each importation of a specific version?
>
> Regards,
> Colin
>
|
|
|
| Re: Does anyone know of an XML editor which works with M5 [message #164300 is a reply to message #162587] |
Mon, 01 December 2003 20:58 |
Scott Ellsworth
Messages: 20
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
In article <bq3gh2$mjv$1@eclipse.org>, "Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com>
wrote:
> "Scott Ellsworth" <scott@alodar.com> wrote in message
> news:scott-D2BDAB.14014526112003@eclipse.org...
> > In article <bq2eak$ero$1@eclipse.org>, "Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It will take me a couple of days to sort this out. If you can limp along
> > > with the workaround for a bit, that would be great. Otherwise, send me
> mail
> > > to bugs at xmlbuddy dot com so I will be sure to let you know when this
> is
> > > fixed. That goes for everyone affected.
> >
> > I note your comments that M5 is neither forward nor backwards
> > compatible, and thus XmlBuddy is not targetted to it. Do you expect it
> > to be locked down a bit better by M6 (Dec 19?)
>
> I am told the release plan says that M6 will have the last breaking api
> changes. At any rate, I plan to ship an M6-compatible version simultaneously
> with M6 or (last-minute breakage is always possible) very shortly
> thereafter. Thereafter, there will be two versions of XMLBuddy, one for
> 2.1.x and one for 3.0, until 3.0 ships.
Thanks - that makes a lot of sense. Since I am busily working in the
SOAP and Perl world this month, I can even wait patiently.
Scott
scott@alodar.com
Java, Cocoa, WebObjects and database consulting
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Jul 17 23:37:06 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04424 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
