| Launch configs feature request? [message #159542] |
Wed, 19 May 2004 17:17  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eclipse.rizzoweb.com
I'm not sure if there is already a way to do this or if there is an
existing Bugzilla entry for it, so I'm asking here before creating an
RFE in Bugzilla.
I have found that I sometimes want the ability to parameterize a Launch
Configuration and specify the value(s) for the parameter(s) at the time
I invoke (Run/Debug). Perhaps a dialog comes up when I Run/Debug a
Launch Config, asking me to provide values for the params [of course it
would remember my previous entry(ies)]. This would require the "Program
Arguments" and "VM Arguments" sections of the Launch Configuration form
to accept some kind of syntax for parameters - I would imagine the Ant
property standard ${param-name} would do just fine.
So, can I accomplish this currently (I use 2.x, but I'd be interested in
hearing about anything in 3.0)? Is there an existing RFE that is similar?
TIA,
Eric
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Launch configs feature request? [message #159814 is a reply to message #159698] |
Fri, 21 May 2004 10:17  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eclipse.rizzoweb.com
Sam Mesh wrote:
> Eric Rizzo wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, I simply can't stand the 3.0M8 UI changes, and I'm not
>> willing to be a guinea pig on an Integration build just to get the
>> pseudo-2.x UI.
>
>
> Why do you call it *pseudo*?
Because that is what it is - a (close?) approximation of what 2.1 looks
and feels like. It still has problems, not the least of which is the
trouble it is to get installed. Alas, that is another thread...
[OK, as I was writing this I got the Bugzilla update for bug 52780 and
it appears that M9 provides an easy switch to get the 2.1 L&F, and that
they've moved the perspective bar back to where it belongs and generally
made more progress since I last looked at it. So I'll reserve my
judgment of applying "pseudo" moniker to it until I've had a chance to
use M9 for a while]
> Are you OK with XP or still use 95? :)
Yes, I'm a big fan of eXtreme Programming. Oh wait, did you mean the OS
whose name Micro$oft ripped off? ;-)
Actually, I despise WinXP for various reasons, probably the biggest
being its default Fisher-Price "skin." Win2k is my desktop OS of choice,
and I revert all the UI options to Win2k style when I am forced to use XP.
That is all irrelevant, I admit - but since you brought it up...
Eric
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03310 seconds
Home