Date formatting on articles is US [message #13435] |
Fri, 02 December 2005 05:39  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Just a minor niggle - I find it hard to read a date listed as
"08‑11‑2005". In the UK that would be in August, but in the US
it's in November. Could the date format be changed to be ISO8601-like such
as 2005-11-08 to remove ambiguity. Obvioulsy it would be rather cool to
use the user's formatting, but I suspect ISO8601 would be easier.
David Bowen
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Date formatting on articles is US [message #13739 is a reply to message #13579] |
Mon, 05 December 2005 14:33  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: alex_blewitt.yahoo.com
+1 for the yyyy-mm-dd format. It's also the only one where lexicographic sorting is the same as date sorting. Lastly, this format is different from both American and European-style dates (as long as you don't use 2 digits for the year :-) so the distinctions should be more noticeable.
|
|
|
Re: Date formatting on articles is US [message #566657 is a reply to message #13435] |
Fri, 02 December 2005 14:21  |
Eclipse Webmaster Messages: 607353 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
+1
I've always been a fan of yyyy-mm-dd myself, mostly because of SQL...
David Bowen wrote:
> Just a minor niggle - I find it hard to read a date listed as
> "08‑11‑2005". In the UK that would be in August, but in the
> US it's in November. Could the date format be changed to be ISO8601-like
> such as 2005-11-08 to remove ambiguity. Obvioulsy it would be rather
> cool to use the user's formatting, but I suspect ISO8601 would be easier.
>
> David Bowen
>
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Date formatting on articles is US [message #566912 is a reply to message #13579] |
Mon, 05 December 2005 14:33  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
+1 for the yyyy-mm-dd format. It's also the only one where lexicographic sorting is the same as date sorting. Lastly, this format is different from both American and European-style dates (as long as you don't use 2 digits for the year :-) so the distinctions should be more noticeable.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05692 seconds