Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Language IDEs » Java Development Tools (JDT) » cvs question
cvs question [message #123644] Tue, 02 December 2003 10:33 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: kaja.cotopia.com

i am currently forced to execute the following command from command line:
cvs update -f -r branch_name module

is it possible to get eclipse to behave during the CVS update as if the
-f
option was used? i need to retrieve the missing files from HEAD if they
are not tagged with branch_name.
Re: cvs question [message #123775 is a reply to message #123644] Tue, 02 December 2003 15:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: bob.news.gmx.net

"karel herink" <kaja@cotopia.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:bqhpq5$f20$1@eclipse.org...
> i am currently forced to execute the following command from command
line:
> cvs update -f -r branch_name module
>
> is it possible to get eclipse to behave during the CVS update as if the
> -f
> option was used?

Not AFAIK.

> i need to retrieve the missing files from HEAD if they
> are not tagged with branch_name.

You had better put the missing files on the branch. What you are doing
looks like a quite dirty fix for a not correct branch operation. You can
merge from head quite easily if you like.

Regards

robert
Re: cvs question [message #124890 is a reply to message #123775] Fri, 05 December 2003 14:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: kaja.cotopia.com

so in other words it is not possible?


Robert Klemme wrote:

> "karel herink" <kaja@cotopia.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:bqhpq5$f20$1@eclipse.org...
> > i am currently forced to execute the following command from command
> line:
> > cvs update -f -r branch_name module
> >
> > is it possible to get eclipse to behave during the CVS update as if the
> > -f
> > option was used?

> Not AFAIK.

> > i need to retrieve the missing files from HEAD if they
> > are not tagged with branch_name.

> You had better put the missing files on the branch. What you are doing
> looks like a quite dirty fix for a not correct branch operation. You can
> merge from head quite easily if you like.

> Regards

> robert
Re: cvs question [message #126627 is a reply to message #124890] Fri, 12 December 2003 05:31 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: huaw.shvns.com

you had better put the missing file into CVS by Eclipse
Previous Topic:Problem Occured restoring saved configuration
Next Topic:Getting Started with classpathContainerInitializer
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Jun 30 09:02:29 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03846 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top