|
| Re: Gef + org.eclipse.ui.ide [message #117658 is a reply to message #117647] |
Mon, 16 February 2004 00:22   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
The intentions are to require only RCP. We should be very close to removing
this dependency.
"James Willans" <jwillans@cs.york.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:c0ocfd$670$1@eclipse.org...
> The integration release of GEF seems to have a dependency on
> org.eclipse.ui.ide which prevents it being used in an RCP context. Why is
> this and are there plans to remove the dependency? If so, how far are we
> away from that point?
>
> Thanks.
>
> James
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Gef + org.eclipse.ui.ide [message #118068 is a reply to message #117647] |
Tue, 17 February 2004 15:48 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
So, we can remove the eclipse.ui.ide requirement, but we cannot remove
"org.eclipse.ui.views". If we did, we wouldn't be able to provide property
sheet support. We can consider making this plug-in optional.
"James Willans" <jwillans@cs.york.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:c0ocfd$670$1@eclipse.org...
> The integration release of GEF seems to have a dependency on
> org.eclipse.ui.ide which prevents it being used in an RCP context. Why is
> this and are there plans to remove the dependency? If so, how far are we
> away from that point?
>
> Thanks.
>
> James
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Gef + org.eclipse.ui.ide [message #118157 is a reply to message #118126] |
Wed, 18 February 2004 00:28 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
AbstractEditPart#getAdapter(Class c) makes a reference to IPropertySource.
So, we need to make sure this code can function properly in the event that
that class is not found. I suppose we need to dynamically lookup the class
at runtime by name. Are you interested in testing the changes once they are
made?
"James Willans" <jwillans@cs.york.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:c0u3bj$pqr$1@eclipse.org...
> That sounds great! At what point will this change get into an integration
> release?
>
> James
>
> Randy Hudson wrote:
>
> > So, we can remove the eclipse.ui.ide requirement, but we cannot remove
> > "org.eclipse.ui.views". If we did, we wouldn't be able to provide
property
> > sheet support. We can consider making this plug-in optional.
>
> > "James Willans" <jwillans@cs.york.ac.uk> wrote in message
> > news:c0ocfd$670$1@eclipse.org...
> > > The integration release of GEF seems to have a dependency on
> > > org.eclipse.ui.ide which prevents it being used in an RCP context.
Why is
> > > this and are there plans to remove the dependency? If so, how far are
we
> > > away from that point?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > James
> > >
>
>
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03511 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
