Eclipse Community Forums: M2M (model-to-model transformation)

Help

Home

Home » Archived » M2M (model-to-model transformation) » UML 1.4 (or UML 1.5) to UML 2.1.x?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

UML 1.4 (or UML 1.5) to UML 2.1.x? [message #93524]

Tue, 28 October 2008 19:22

Tom Morris

Messages: 89
Registered: July 2009

Member

Is there a UML 1.4 to UML 2.1.2 (or any close variant of UML 2.x)
transformation available for ATL? In the pre-Eclipse days, ATL included
support for NetBeans MDR. Is this still included (or is there another
way to read MOF 1.4 based models)?

There was a previous query about MDR
(news://news.eclipse.org:119/fsg6ur$nja$1@build.eclipse.org), but either
it's a typo for MDL (as in Rose Petal file) or it means something else
in this context.

I did look through the ATL transformation zoo, but wasn't able to spot
anything which looked relevant. (As an aside, it would be useful if the
descriptions of the UML transformations included what version of UML
they worked with).

Tom

Report message to a moderator

Re: UML 1.4 (or UML 1.5) to UML 2.1.x? [message #93778 is a reply to message #93524]

Wed, 29 October 2008 14:11

Alfons Laarman

Messages: 71
Registered: July 2009

Member

Hi,

As far as i know; ATL CVS still contains a MDR project, which needs extra
libraries.
In the zoo i found this relkated transformation:
http://www.eclipse.org/m2m/atl/atlTransformations/#UMLCopyMo del

Regards,

Alfons

"Tom Morris" <tfmorris@gmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:ge7oq3$7du$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Is there a UML 1.4 to UML 2.1.2 (or any close variant of UML 2.x)
> transformation available for ATL? In the pre-Eclipse days, ATL included
> support for NetBeans MDR. Is this still included (or is there another way
> to read MOF 1.4 based models)?
>
> There was a previous query about MDR
> (news://news.eclipse.org:119/fsg6ur$nja$1@build.eclipse.org), but either
> it's a typo for MDL (as in Rose Petal file) or it means something else in
> this context.
>
> I did look through the ATL transformation zoo, but wasn't able to spot
> anything which looked relevant. (As an aside, it would be useful if the
> descriptions of the UML transformations included what version of UML they
> worked with).
>
> Tom

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Standalone ATL execution with UML
Next Topic:	[ATL] Structuring a transformation in different files / libraries

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Tue Jan 28 15:15:54 GMT 2025

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter