Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Language IDEs » ServerTools (WTP) » Question on Flexible Project Structures
Question on Flexible Project Structures [message #85173] Sun, 20 March 2005 19:01 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: ukuntamu.bea.com

Hi,

I'm looking into the flex project structures to see if it suits my
requirements. I'm extending Eclipse to support a new set of file types that
need to be built and deployed (.ear format) onto a target server.

These file types can be a part of a J2EE Web application project (which is
of flex project type). Shall I create a module for my file types and a
separate builder and deployer? And then using the .wtpmodules file for the
web application project, declare my module type, even though the deployed
artifacts will be .ear file different from .war file?

Does WTP recommend such an approach? What are my other alternatives? I would
strongly want to avoid creating my own project type since the end user might
want to create my file types when he/she is working on a J2EE project?

Thanks!
Usha
Re: Question on Flexible Project Structures [message #85915 is a reply to message #85173] Tue, 22 March 2005 23:07 Go to previous message
Chuck Bridgham is currently offline Chuck BridghamFriend
Messages: 35
Registered: July 2009
Member
Usha wrote:

> Hi,

> I'm looking into the flex project structures to see if it suits my
> requirements. I'm extending Eclipse to support a new set of file types that
> need to be built and deployed (.ear format) onto a target server.

> These file types can be a part of a J2EE Web application project (which is
> of flex project type). Shall I create a module for my file types and a
> separate builder and deployer? And then using the .wtpmodules file for the
> web application project, declare my module type, even though the deployed
> artifacts will be .ear file different from .war file?

> Does WTP recommend such an approach? What are my other alternatives? I would
> strongly want to avoid creating my own project type since the end user might
> want to create my file types when he/she is working on a J2EE project?

> Thanks!
> Usha

Hi Usha,

To make sure I understand your requirments. You have another component
type seperate from WAR or EAR, but can be referenced by a war and packaged
in an ear? Or are you just asking for EAR support in general?
It is true in M3 we only supported war and java.util types, but we are
currently adding ear,ejb,rar, and appclient. In our M4 integration builds.
I can help you create a new component type if needed.
If not, this weeks IB should have EAR creation support.

Thanks - Chuck
Previous Topic:Weblogic 7.0
Next Topic:JSP Files Not Published
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Dec 26 22:44:14 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02993 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top