| Parameterized vararg match problem [message #56077] |
Sat, 27 August 2005 21:44  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
The pointcut in the example below is not applied.
public class Test1<E> {
public void method1(E...args) {
}
}
public aspect TestAspect {
after(Test1 test1, Object[] arg) returning: execution(*
Test1.method1(Object...)) && target(test1) && args(arg) {
System.out.println("got here");
}
}
If I remove vararg from the pointcut declaration (below) then the pointcut
is applied ok.
public aspect TestAspect {
after(Test1 test1) returning: execution(* Test1.method1(Object...)) &&
target(test1) {
System.out.println("got here");
}
}
Is there something wrong with the declaration or is it a bug?
I am using AJDT M3.
Thanks,
Roman
|
|
|
|
| Re: Parameterized vararg match problem [message #56311 is a reply to message #56157] |
Tue, 30 August 2005 20:19  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=108437
Thanks,
Roman
"Adrian Colyer" <adrian_colyer@uk.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:df220a$b4h$1@news.eclipse.org...
> Roman Kishchenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The pointcut in the example below is not applied.
>>
>> public class Test1<E> {
>> public void method1(E...args) {
>> }
>> }
>>
>> public aspect TestAspect {
>> after(Test1 test1, Object[] arg) returning: execution(*
>> Test1.method1(Object...)) && target(test1) && args(arg) {
>> System.out.println("got here");
>> }
>> }
>>
>
> I confirm I can reproduce this bug. It only occurs when the vararg type is
> a type parameter (ie. if you change the definition of method1 to take an
> (Object... args) parameter then the matching works as expected.
>
> Please raise a bug report and I'll get this fixed for you.
> Thks, Adrian.
|
|
|
| Re: Parameterized vararg match problem [message #589937 is a reply to message #56077] |
Tue, 30 August 2005 12:37 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Roman Kishchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The pointcut in the example below is not applied.
>
> public class Test1<E> {
> public void method1(E...args) {
> }
> }
>
> public aspect TestAspect {
> after(Test1 test1, Object[] arg) returning: execution(*
> Test1.method1(Object...)) && target(test1) && args(arg) {
> System.out.println("got here");
> }
> }
>
I confirm I can reproduce this bug. It only occurs when the vararg type
is a type parameter (ie. if you change the definition of method1 to take
an (Object... args) parameter then the matching works as expected.
Please raise a bug report and I'll get this fixed for you.
Thks, Adrian.
|
|
|
| Re: Parameterized vararg match problem [message #589954 is a reply to message #56157] |
Tue, 30 August 2005 20:19 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=108437
Thanks,
Roman
"Adrian Colyer" <adrian_colyer@uk.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:df220a$b4h$1@news.eclipse.org...
> Roman Kishchenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The pointcut in the example below is not applied.
>>
>> public class Test1<E> {
>> public void method1(E...args) {
>> }
>> }
>>
>> public aspect TestAspect {
>> after(Test1 test1, Object[] arg) returning: execution(*
>> Test1.method1(Object...)) && target(test1) && args(arg) {
>> System.out.println("got here");
>> }
>> }
>>
>
> I confirm I can reproduce this bug. It only occurs when the vararg type is
> a type parameter (ie. if you change the definition of method1 to take an
> (Object... args) parameter then the matching works as expected.
>
> Please raise a bug report and I'll get this fixed for you.
> Thks, Adrian.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03622 seconds
Home