org.eclipse.emf.teneo.annotations.util.EcoreDataTypes [message #56053] |
Tue, 03 October 2006 05:37 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c6e6/2c6e68d8362551597c463958a424d463b518c134" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
Eclipse Userdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9929d/9929d36c60d5b9d237c9496f2c221895a748cc68" alt="Friend of Eclipse Friend" |
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030107050308020602050305
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Martin:
Why this packaging? The class is useful even if annotations are not
being used in an application.
Why not org.eclipse.emf.teneo.util.EcoreDataTypes ?
Just curious about it. It doesn't introduce a new dependency for me
since I will be using Teneo annotations in my full development.
However, I could have (should have) been using this class (for its
convenience tests) in my first-cut code. In my first-cut code, I have
no dependency on annotations. But I also have poor coverage of the
Ecore data types.
-- Dan
--------------030107050308020602050305
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Arial">Martin:<br>
<br>
Why this packaging? The class is useful even if annotations are not
being used in an application.<br>
<br>
Why not org.eclipse.emf.teneo.util.EcoreDataTypes ?<br>
<br>
Just curious about it. It doesn't introduce a new dependency for me
since I will be using Teneo annotations in my full development.
However, I could have (should have) been using this class (for its
convenience tests) in my first-cut code. In my first-cut code, I
have no dependency on annotations. But I also have poor coverage of
the Ecore data types.<br>
<br>
-- Dan<br>
</font>
</body>
</html>
--------------030107050308020602050305--
|
|
|
Re: org.eclipse.emf.teneo.annotations.util.EcoreDataTypes [message #56079 is a reply to message #56053] |
Tue, 03 October 2006 05:52 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df86b/df86b30dd5fe688de12d6c5497e737dd937a240f" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" |
Eclipse Userdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9929d/9929d36c60d5b9d237c9496f2c221895a748cc68" alt="Friend of Eclipse Friend" |
|
|
|
Dan,
No other reason than historical, it was placed there because it was first only used in the
annotations package. As it is also used in the hibernatemapper I agree that a more generic location
is appropriate. I have moved it to org.eclipse.emf.teneo.util.
gr. Martin
Dan Connelly wrote:
> Martin:
>
> Why this packaging? The class is useful even if annotations are not
> being used in an application.
>
> Why not org.eclipse.emf.teneo.util.EcoreDataTypes ?
>
> Just curious about it. It doesn't introduce a new dependency for me
> since I will be using Teneo annotations in my full development.
> However, I could have (should have) been using this class (for its
> convenience tests) in my first-cut code. In my first-cut code, I have
> no dependency on annotations. But I also have poor coverage of the
> Ecore data types.
>
> -- Dan
--
With Regards, Martin Taal
Springsite/Elver.org
Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
Mail: mtaal@springsite.com - mtaal@elver.org
Web: www.springsite.com - www.elver.org
|
|
|
Re: org.eclipse.emf.teneo.annotations.util.EcoreDataTypes [message #593410 is a reply to message #56053] |
Tue, 03 October 2006 05:52 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df86b/df86b30dd5fe688de12d6c5497e737dd937a240f" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" |
Eclipse Userdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9929d/9929d36c60d5b9d237c9496f2c221895a748cc68" alt="Friend of Eclipse Friend" |
|
|
|
Dan,
No other reason than historical, it was placed there because it was first only used in the
annotations package. As it is also used in the hibernatemapper I agree that a more generic location
is appropriate. I have moved it to org.eclipse.emf.teneo.util.
gr. Martin
Dan Connelly wrote:
> Martin:
>
> Why this packaging? The class is useful even if annotations are not
> being used in an application.
>
> Why not org.eclipse.emf.teneo.util.EcoreDataTypes ?
>
> Just curious about it. It doesn't introduce a new dependency for me
> since I will be using Teneo annotations in my full development.
> However, I could have (should have) been using this class (for its
> convenience tests) in my first-cut code. In my first-cut code, I have
> no dependency on annotations. But I also have poor coverage of the
> Ecore data types.
>
> -- Dan
--
With Regards, Martin Taal
Springsite/Elver.org
Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
Mail: mtaal@springsite.com - mtaal@elver.org
Web: www.springsite.com - www.elver.org
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03849 seconds