| What's with Nebula? [message #54465] |
Wed, 11 June 2008 15:42  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
I went through the list of Projects the other day and noticed, Nebula
got a "strike-through" Incubator Icon next to it.
Normally most such projects have been withdrawn or stopped.
And only those with a Check Mark sign instead of the Incubator Egg
successfully evolved.
Can you explain what this means?
Or please fix the icon if it should be wrong.
Thanks,
Werner
|
|
|
| Re: What's with Nebula? [message #54492 is a reply to message #54465] |
Thu, 12 June 2008 13:15  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
It means that the project is not fully compliant with the incubator status.
AFAIK, this is only because some widget doen't provide an IP log.
Each widget is evolving separately with their own developpers, so it's
hard to get a fully conforming project.
--
Nicolas
Werner Keil a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I went through the list of Projects the other day and noticed, Nebula
> got a "strike-through" Incubator Icon next to it.
>
> Normally most such projects have been withdrawn or stopped.
> And only those with a Check Mark sign instead of the Incubator Egg
> successfully evolved.
>
> Can you explain what this means?
> Or please fix the icon if it should be wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> Werner
|
|
|
| Re: What's with Nebula? [message #590452 is a reply to message #54465] |
Thu, 12 June 2008 13:15 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
It means that the project is not fully compliant with the incubator status.
AFAIK, this is only because some widget doen't provide an IP log.
Each widget is evolving separately with their own developpers, so it's
hard to get a fully conforming project.
--
Nicolas
Werner Keil a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I went through the list of Projects the other day and noticed, Nebula
> got a "strike-through" Incubator Icon next to it.
>
> Normally most such projects have been withdrawn or stopped.
> And only those with a Check Mark sign instead of the Incubator Egg
> successfully evolved.
>
> Can you explain what this means?
> Or please fix the icon if it should be wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> Werner
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.08016 seconds
Home