Eclipse Community Forums: Nebula » Gallery: make getGroup() public?

Help

Home

Home » Eclipse Projects » Nebula » Gallery: make getGroup() public?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Gallery: make getGroup() public? [message #54199]

Fri, 06 June 2008 09:19

Justin Dolezy

Messages: 68
Registered: July 2009

Member

Question for Nicolas I guess!

Can Gallery.getGroup() be exposed as public??

I need this for drag'n'drop support... obviously there's no GalleryItem in
empty areas so can't getParentItem.

Thanks,
Justin

Report message to a moderator

Re: Gallery: make getGroup() public? [message #54413 is a reply to message #54199]

Wed, 11 June 2008 08:04

Nicolas Richeton

Messages: 179
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi,

There are 2 options here :
* make getGroup public
* change getItem so it returns the group if there is no child item under
the mouse. But this can break some applications.

I'm not sure which one is the best right now. I have to check Table and
Tree API.

Would this 2 options work for you ?

--
Nicolas

Justin Dolezy a écrit :
> Question for Nicolas I guess!
>
> Can Gallery.getGroup() be exposed as public??
>
> I need this for drag'n'drop support... obviously there's no GalleryItem
> in empty areas so can't getParentItem.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Gallery: make getGroup() public? [message #54438 is a reply to message #54413]

Wed, 11 June 2008 09:31

Justin Dolezy

Messages: 68
Registered: July 2009

Member

Hi Nicolas,

I can't remember what cut of the code I have but I did try the 2nd idea of
changing getItem and, as you say, it broke things big time. I made
getGroup public and this did the trick - this is what I'd prefer as it'd
be the most straightforward change with no side effects on others.

Justin

Nicolas Richeton wrote:

> Hi,

> There are 2 options here :
> * make getGroup public
> * change getItem so it returns the group if there is no child item under
> the mouse. But this can break some applications.

> I'm not sure which one is the best right now. I have to check Table and
> Tree API.

> Would this 2 options work for you ?

> --
> Nicolas

> Justin Dolezy a écrit :
>> Question for Nicolas I guess!
>>
>> Can Gallery.getGroup() be exposed as public??
>>
>> I need this for drag'n'drop support... obviously there's no GalleryItem
>> in empty areas so can't getParentItem.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Gallery: make getGroup() public? [message #54738 is a reply to message #54438]

Sat, 21 June 2008 09:55

Nicolas Richeton

Messages: 179
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi Justin,

getGroup() is now public, see latest version on CVS.

--
Nicolas

Justin Dolezy a écrit :
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I can't remember what cut of the code I have but I did try the 2nd idea
> of changing getItem and, as you say, it broke things big time. I made
> getGroup public and this did the trick - this is what I'd prefer as it'd
> be the most straightforward change with no side effects on others.
>
> Justin
>
> Nicolas Richeton wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
>> There are 2 options here :
>> * make getGroup public
>> * change getItem so it returns the group if there is no child item
>> under the mouse. But this can break some applications.
>
>> I'm not sure which one is the best right now. I have to check Table
>> and Tree API.
>
>> Would this 2 options work for you ?
>
>> --
>> Nicolas
>
>> Justin Dolezy a écrit :
>>> Question for Nicolas I guess!
>>>
>>> Can Gallery.getGroup() be exposed as public??
>>>
>>> I need this for drag'n'drop support... obviously there's no
>>> GalleryItem in empty areas so can't getParentItem.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>>>
>>>
>
>

Report message to a moderator