ajdt does not build on save [message #53031] |
Sun, 05 June 2005 16:44  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I've gotten into a state where ajdt only compiles on a clean. Saves to .aj files do not build. I have no idea how it got this. Restarting eclipse has no effect.
Hmm, its not exactly that nothing happens. Red-squiqqlies are added/removed on save. But a change to a pointcut (eg, add/remove a provides) does not generate an error in the advice. After a full recompile, the advice gets the error for unbound argument.
Any idea on how to debug this?
-barry
|
|
|
Re: ajdt does not build on save [message #53055 is a reply to message #53031] |
Sun, 05 June 2005 16:45  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Never mind. I somehow unchecked the "Build Automatically". (I thought I checked that first before posting, but my eyes must have decieved me.)
-bk
Barry Kaplan wrote:
> I've gotten into a state where ajdt only compiles on a clean. Saves to
> .aj files do not build. I have no idea how it got this. Restarting
> eclipse has no effect.
>
> Hmm, its not exactly that nothing happens. Red-squiqqlies are
> added/removed on save. But a change to a pointcut (eg, add/remove a
> provides) does not generate an error in the advice. After a full
> recompile, the advice gets the error for unbound argument.
>
> Any idea on how to debug this?
>
> -barry
|
|
|
Re: ajdt does not build on save [message #588634 is a reply to message #53031] |
Sun, 05 June 2005 16:45  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Never mind. I somehow unchecked the "Build Automatically". (I thought I checked that first before posting, but my eyes must have decieved me.)
-bk
Barry Kaplan wrote:
> I've gotten into a state where ajdt only compiles on a clean. Saves to
> .aj files do not build. I have no idea how it got this. Restarting
> eclipse has no effect.
>
> Hmm, its not exactly that nothing happens. Red-squiqqlies are
> added/removed on save. But a change to a pointcut (eg, add/remove a
> provides) does not generate an error in the advice. After a full
> recompile, the advice gets the error for unbound argument.
>
> Any idea on how to debug this?
>
> -barry
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02174 seconds