Where is VE? [message #51849] |
Sun, 25 July 2004 12:54  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: danmcleran.hotmail.com
I have installed:
eclipse sdk 3.0
gef runtime 3.0
emf-sdo runtime 2.0.0
ve runtime S20040628
When I start eclipse, I don't see any way to create a new visual class.
When I try to add a library to my project, I don't see an option to add
the swt library. Am I missing something? What else could I try to get SWT
working?
Thanks,
Dan McLeran
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Where is VE? [message #55295 is a reply to message #51903] |
Sun, 08 August 2004 23:05  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: danmcleran.hotmail.com
No, this was my first attempt at installing the VE. I had been using
Eclipse as a Java and C++ IDE, previously. Like I said, after I re-named
the configuration directoy, all is well.
Jeff Myers wrote:
> Dan,
> Have you installed a VE build before this latest stable build? The
> configuration issue is due to the VE builds all having the same plug-in
> version number (1.0.0). When Eclipse starts up it checks for new
> plug-ins and new versions of existing plug-ins. Since these development
> builds of VE all have the same version number, it doesn't know that it
> has to recache the VE plug-ins info. Removing the configuration
> directory forces Eclipse to recache the plug-in info for all installed
> plug-ins (including VE).
> - Jeff
> > All,
> >
> > After scouring the message board for similar problems, I saw someone
> > suggest deleting the configuration dir. I did the following:
> >
> > 1. Shut down eclipse.
> > 2. rename the configuration dir.
> > 3. restart eclipse.
> >
> > I was then able to add swt as a library.
> >
> > Is there some guidelines to follow for when to rename/delete the
> > configuration directory? It seems like a weakness in eclipse. I thought
> > that eclipse was designed to recognize when plugins/added functionality
> > had been installed.
> >
> >
|
|
|
Re: Where is VE? [message #595801 is a reply to message #51849] |
Sun, 25 July 2004 13:14  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Dan McLeran wrote:
> I have installed:
> eclipse sdk 3.0
> gef runtime 3.0
> emf-sdo runtime 2.0.0
> ve runtime S20040628
> When I start eclipse, I don't see any way to create a new visual class.
> When I try to add a library to my project, I don't see an option to add
> the swt library. Am I missing something? What else could I try to get SWT
> working?
> Thanks,
> Dan McLeran
All,
After scouring the message board for similar problems, I saw someone
suggest deleting the configuration dir. I did the following:
1. Shut down eclipse.
2. rename the configuration dir.
3. restart eclipse.
I was then able to add swt as a library.
Is there some guidelines to follow for when to rename/delete the
configuration directory? It seems like a weakness in eclipse. I thought
that eclipse was designed to recognize when plugins/added functionality
had been installed.
|
|
|
Re: Where is VE? [message #595816 is a reply to message #51877] |
Sun, 25 July 2004 13:22  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Dan,
Have you installed a VE build before this latest stable build? The
configuration issue is due to the VE builds all having the same plug-in
version number (1.0.0). When Eclipse starts up it checks for new
plug-ins and new versions of existing plug-ins. Since these development
builds of VE all have the same version number, it doesn't know that it
has to recache the VE plug-ins info. Removing the configuration
directory forces Eclipse to recache the plug-in info for all installed
plug-ins (including VE).
- Jeff
> All,
>
> After scouring the message board for similar problems, I saw someone
> suggest deleting the configuration dir. I did the following:
>
> 1. Shut down eclipse.
> 2. rename the configuration dir.
> 3. restart eclipse.
>
> I was then able to add swt as a library.
>
> Is there some guidelines to follow for when to rename/delete the
> configuration directory? It seems like a weakness in eclipse. I thought
> that eclipse was designed to recognize when plugins/added functionality
> had been installed.
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Where is VE? [message #595834 is a reply to message #51877] |
Sun, 25 July 2004 14:47  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Dan McLeran wrote:
>
> All,
>
> After scouring the message board for similar problems, I saw someone
> suggest deleting the configuration dir. I did the following:
>
> 1. Shut down eclipse.
> 2. rename the configuration dir.
> 3. restart eclipse.
>
> I was then able to add swt as a library.
>
> Is there some guidelines to follow for when to rename/delete the
> configuration directory? It seems like a weakness in eclipse. I thought
> that eclipse was designed to recognize when plugins/added functionality
> had been installed.
>
>
It is probably better to use the -clean flag instead of removing the
configuration directory. That flag causes eclipse to clean up and redo
the configuration.
Peter
|
|
|
Re: Where is VE? [message #597027 is a reply to message #51903] |
Sun, 08 August 2004 23:05  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
No, this was my first attempt at installing the VE. I had been using
Eclipse as a Java and C++ IDE, previously. Like I said, after I re-named
the configuration directoy, all is well.
Jeff Myers wrote:
> Dan,
> Have you installed a VE build before this latest stable build? The
> configuration issue is due to the VE builds all having the same plug-in
> version number (1.0.0). When Eclipse starts up it checks for new
> plug-ins and new versions of existing plug-ins. Since these development
> builds of VE all have the same version number, it doesn't know that it
> has to recache the VE plug-ins info. Removing the configuration
> directory forces Eclipse to recache the plug-in info for all installed
> plug-ins (including VE).
> - Jeff
> > All,
> >
> > After scouring the message board for similar problems, I saw someone
> > suggest deleting the configuration dir. I did the following:
> >
> > 1. Shut down eclipse.
> > 2. rename the configuration dir.
> > 3. restart eclipse.
> >
> > I was then able to add swt as a library.
> >
> > Is there some guidelines to follow for when to rename/delete the
> > configuration directory? It seems like a weakness in eclipse. I thought
> > that eclipse was designed to recognize when plugins/added functionality
> > had been installed.
> >
> >
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03229 seconds