|
|
|
Re: Large jar on InPath [message #51083 is a reply to message #51055] |
Mon, 25 April 2005 12:30 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: clemas.uk.ibm.com
Hi Barry,
There is a lot for us to do in the area of improving incremental
compilation, we have these bugs open right now:
85297 Improvements to incremental compilation
83890 incremental: only do a full build if pointcuts change
83891 incremental compiles should handle file deletion gracefully
83894 incremental: output weave times & files woven & heuristics
The most active one is the top one where I am appending notes on my
changes as I make them. I'm really tackling the problems in the order
that affects most people - right now that is people with multiple
inter-dependant AJ projects (for example the AJDT project itself!), the
compile times are a killer and I'm hoping to provide some fixes in that
area this week.
Your comment about fast builds unless you modify an aspect is covered by
83890.
On the large jar thing - it doesn't matter that you are using withincode
to try and limit what is matched, the compiler still needs to open all
the classes up to see which members are matched by your withincode
pointcut. within() which works at the type level would be a better
choice than withincode() actually - but how much that might affect your
compile times, I'm not sure. Chatting with the AJDT team, the access
rules you have been specifying are ignored by AJDT - but we could think
about supporting them to cope with large jars - if you have
findings/complaints/timings, please append them to 85297.
cheers,
Andy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05438 seconds