| how to refer to the same instance of the model from different notation diagrams [message #44757] |
Mon, 11 September 2006 12:20  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: marguu.libero.it
Hi all! I'd like to know how I can refer to the same instance of the mod=
el =
from different instances of the diagram. I've modified the code of my g=
mf =
editor to point always t the same model file, but i'd like to be able to=
=
operate on a unique instance in memory of the root element of the resour=
ce =
associated with this file. How can I reach this aim?
Thanks in advance
-- =
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
|
|
|
|
| Re: how to refer to the same instance of the model from different notation diagrams [message #44979 is a reply to message #44933] |
Mon, 11 September 2006 15:32  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: marguu.libero.it
Thanks for the reply. I just use a single instance of the EditingDomain.=
=
All works fine, but if I try to modify simultaneously two diagrams I =
obtain an incosistence like in the following scenario:
1. I create two diagrams A and B
2. I add an element "a" in the diagram A
3. I don't save
4. I add an element "b" in the diagram B
5. I save the diagram A
6. The model contains the new element "a"
7. I save the diagram B
8. In the model the element "b" overrides the element "a"
Where is the error? I'd like to obtain a consistent model.
Note: if I add a new element and save the diagram before I switch into a=
n =
another diagram, I don't reach problems. What should I do?
Thanks Angelo
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC), Alex Shatalin <vano@borland.co=
m> =
wrote:
> Hello Angelo,
>
> Looks like you should always use single instance of the EditingDomain.=
=
> Take a look on the following thread: =
> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.technology.gmf /msg04116.=
html.
>
> -----------------
> Alex Shatalin
>
>
-- =
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
|
|
|
|
| Re: how to refer to the same instance of the model from different notation diagrams [message #45797 is a reply to message #44997] |
Tue, 12 September 2006 09:19 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: marguu.libero.it
I've tried to use an unique editingDomain (I used a static value in the =
=
XXXDiagramEditor.createEditingDomain()) but I found two problems:
1. Resourses: if I operate simultaneously fow example on three diagrams =
=
all works fine. But if I delete all the diagram files and then I create =
a =
new diagram file in the workspace I find three files (one is new and it =
is =
consistence; two have the old names but they are corrupted). How can I =
delete these old references?
2. CommandStack: if I use an unique editingDomain I have to use a unique=
=
command stack, isn't it? For example:
a) I create the diagram A and the diagram B
b) I add the element 1 in the diagram A
c) I add the element 2 in the diagram B
d) I switch again in the diagram A
e) I undo the last change
In this manner I delete the element 2 in the diagram B, not the element=
1 =
in the diagram A as I aspect
How can I workaround this problem?
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
| Re: how to refer to the same instance of the model from different notation diagrams [message #45951 is a reply to message #45856] |
Tue, 12 September 2006 10:44 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: marguu.libero.it
The bug that you suggest me can resolve a problem of mine, but it doesn'=
t =
work for the problem described in the following example (I rewrite it in=
=
order to be comprehensible for everyone):
"If I operate simultaneously for example on three diagrams all works fin=
e. =
But if I delete all the diagram files and then I create a new diagram fi=
le =
in the workspace I find three files (one is new and it is consistence; t=
wo =
have the old names but they are corrupted). How can I delete these old =
references?"
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:41:26 +0000 (UTC), Alex Shatalin <vano@borland.co=
m> =
wrote:
> Hello Angelo,
>
>> 1. Resourses: if I operate simultaneously fow example on three
>> diagrams
> Looks like a problem described in this request: =
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D153893 Should be fixed=
in =
> 1.0.1 and 2.0 builds.
>
>> 2. CommandStack: if I use an unique editingDomain I have to use a
>> unique
> This is a question to runtime team, but it looks like a side-effect=
=
> your application will have.
>
> -----------------
> Alex Shatalin
>
>
-- =
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
|
|
|
|
| Re: how to refer to the same instance of the model from different notation diagrams [message #46489 is a reply to message #45978] |
Tue, 12 September 2006 13:59 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: marguu.libero.it
Thanks for the suggestion! I've installed the last 1.0 Stream Maintenanc=
e =
Build (in particulary the file GMF-sdk-M20060907.zip, is it rigth? What =
is =
the meant of the X icon on the left?) and all works fine.
Now I'd like to solve another problem: I'd like to make dirty only the =
editor that I'm modifying. How can I reach this aim? How does the =
DemultiplexingListener.handleNotification() operation in the =
XXXDocumentProvider.CustomModificationListener work?
I have even a question: in the previous answer you told me to ask for th=
e =
CommandStack problem to the runtime team. In which newsgroup have I to =
post this question?
Thanks, Angelo
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:59:40 +0000 (UTC), Alex Shatalin <vano@borland.co=
m> =
wrote:
> Hello Angelo,
>
>> But if I delete all the diagram files and then I create a new diagram=
>> file in the workspace I find three files (one is new and it is =
>> consistence;
>> two have the old names but they are corrupted). How can I delete thes=
e =
>> old
>> references?"
> AFAIU these two additional (corrupted) files will be created in a =
> workspace as a side-effect of that bug (at least I suppose so and you =
=
> can check it). If you update GMF with the fix to the mentioned request=
=
> in this situation two unnecessary files should not be created anymore.=
=
> Did you tried to update to the latest build and get the same problem? =
=
> Does mentioned fix solve the problem or are you talking about the =
> possibility to remove references to the corresponding resources (two =
> closed diagrams) from the shared ResourceSet?
>
> -----------------
> Alex Shatalin
>
>
-- =
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
|
|
|
| Re: how to refer to the same instance of the model from different notation diagrams [message #46517 is a reply to message #46489] |
Tue, 12 September 2006 14:25 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: marguu.libero.it
In particular I'd like to know how the code =
"document.setContent(document.getContent());" works. In fact if I commen=
t =
this line in the DemultiplexingListener.handleNotification() operation, =
I =
obtain the wanted result!
Thanks in advance.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:59:30 +0200, Angelo Marguglio <marguu@libero.it> =
=
wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion! I've installed the last 1.0 Stream =
> Maintenance Build (in particulary the file GMF-sdk-M20060907.zip, is i=
t =
> rigth? What is the meant of the X icon on the left?) and all works fin=
e.
> Now I'd like to solve another problem: I'd like to make dirty only the=
=
> editor that I'm modifying. How can I reach this aim? How does the =
> DemultiplexingListener.handleNotification() operation in the =
> XXXDocumentProvider.CustomModificationListener work?
>
> I have even a question: in the previous answer you told me to ask for =
=
> the CommandStack problem to the runtime team. In which newsgroup have =
I =
> to post this question?
>
> Thanks, Angelo
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:59:40 +0000 (UTC), Alex Shatalin =
> <vano@borland.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Angelo,
>>
>>> But if I delete all the diagram files and then I create a new diagra=
m
>>> file in the workspace I find three files (one is new and it is =
>>> consistence;
>>> two have the old names but they are corrupted). How can I delete the=
se =
>>> old
>>> references?"
>> AFAIU these two additional (corrupted) files will be created in a =
>> workspace as a side-effect of that bug (at least I suppose so and you=
=
>> can check it). If you update GMF with the fix to the mentioned reques=
t =
>> in this situation two unnecessary files should not be created anymore=
.. =
>> Did you tried to update to the latest build and get the same problem?=
=
>> Does mentioned fix solve the problem or are you talking about the =
>> possibility to remove references to the corresponding resources (two =
=
>> closed diagrams) from the shared ResourceSet?
>>
>> -----------------
>> Alex Shatalin
>>
>>
>
>
>
-- =
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
|
|
|
|
| SOLVED Re: how to refer to the same instance of the model from different notation diagrams [message #46644 is a reply to message #46598] |
Tue, 12 September 2006 15:12 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: marguu.libero.it
Thanks a lot! Now I'll post the CommandStack problem in a new thread in =
=
order to give it a gretaer visibility!
Thanks Angelo
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:44:24 +0000 (UTC), Alex Shatalin <vano@borland.co=
m> =
wrote:
> Hello Angelo,
>
>> "document.setContent(document.getContent());" works. In fact if I
>> comment this line in the DemultiplexingListener.handleNotification()
>> operation, I obtain the wanted result!
> This is a listener for change notifications from the underlying =
> resources. Once you change any of the resources loaded into the resour=
ce =
> set associated with openned diagram, then =
> "document.setContent(document.getContent());" will be called to mark =
> editor is dirty. I do not think you should mark only one editor as =
=
> "dirty" because if you'll try to open another diagram referencing the =
=
> same model instance (this is what are you going to do AFAIU) and make =
=
> any modifications in the underlying model - another diagram will be =
> changed as well, so editor should be marked as dirty. But you can try =
it.
> Concerning CommandStack =E2=80=93 I suggest you to wait a bit and I=
hope =
> somebody from the runtime team will post an answer to this question. =
> Runtime is just a part of GMF, but I=E2=80=99m not responsible for it =
and simply =
> can not answer some concrete questions especially concerning command =
> processing. ;-)
>
> -----------------
> Alex Shatalin
>
>
-- =
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.06223 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
