Home » Language IDEs » ServerTools (WTP) » Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions
| Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions [message #3891] |
Mon, 16 June 2003 19:36  |
 John Wiegand
Messages: 7
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
We had a good turnout at the Eclipse BoF at JavaOne. I talked to many who
wanted to participate in the web tooling project. The initial interest
seems to be in a few areas:
1. server tooling - an application runtime neutral abstraction for
launching/debugging/... servers.
2. support for editing and developing web artifacts (xml, html, jsp, ...).
The initial comments appear to be related to source editing, although I have
heard some interest in providing source editing. There is some related
enabling work in the platform that will hopefully make this easier to do and
the results better.
3. project "definition". How do we preserve flexible layout of web
projects? How do we use project natures? etc.
4. j2ee models. In order to address many interesting problems, you need a
model to talk to. We need a common j2ee model to be able to build
interesting tools.
Now for a few questions:
1. Are you interested in contributing in the above areas? (details?)
2. Are there areas that are missing from the above that you would like to
contribute in?
Some informal offers for contribution have already been made. As we
understand the areas better, we need to collect contributions in them so we
can choose the best starting points. We are not looking for a "product"
level contribution, rather, we want contributions that correspond to the
areas (as we together enumerate them). (It is ok for you to provide multiple
contributions - we just don't want to think of them as a single proposal.)
John
PS: Just to make matters more interesting, I will be relocating over the
next few weeks (from Minnesota to Oregon). So please don't (directly)
correlate my response time with the content of your message...
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions [message #3910 is a reply to message #3891] |
Mon, 16 June 2003 21:26  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: arashid.alpha-gamma.com
J2EE Patterns... I don't know in which area are you going to put this (May
be in J2EE models), but it is also very important. I have experience in
working with different J2EE patterns and I also used different development
environments for this purpose. I willing to working in this area, please let
me know what should I do?
Regards
Asif Rashid
"John Wiegand" <john_wiegand@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:bcl685$p2f$1@rogue.oti.com...
> We had a good turnout at the Eclipse BoF at JavaOne. I talked to many who
> wanted to participate in the web tooling project. The initial interest
> seems to be in a few areas:
> 1. server tooling - an application runtime neutral abstraction for
> launching/debugging/... servers.
> 2. support for editing and developing web artifacts (xml, html, jsp, ...).
> The initial comments appear to be related to source editing, although I
have
> heard some interest in providing source editing. There is some related
> enabling work in the platform that will hopefully make this easier to do
and
> the results better.
> 3. project "definition". How do we preserve flexible layout of web
> projects? How do we use project natures? etc.
> 4. j2ee models. In order to address many interesting problems, you need a
> model to talk to. We need a common j2ee model to be able to build
> interesting tools.
>
> Now for a few questions:
> 1. Are you interested in contributing in the above areas? (details?)
> 2. Are there areas that are missing from the above that you would like to
> contribute in?
>
> Some informal offers for contribution have already been made. As we
> understand the areas better, we need to collect contributions in them so
we
> can choose the best starting points. We are not looking for a "product"
> level contribution, rather, we want contributions that correspond to the
> areas (as we together enumerate them). (It is ok for you to provide
multiple
> contributions - we just don't want to think of them as a single proposal.)
>
> John
>
> PS: Just to make matters more interesting, I will be relocating over the
> next few weeks (from Minnesota to Oregon). So please don't (directly)
> correlate my response time with the content of your message...
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions [message #3916 is a reply to message #3891] |
Tue, 17 June 2003 01:22 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: alex.fitzpatrick.rogers.com
John Wiegand wrote:
> We had a good turnout at the Eclipse BoF at JavaOne. I talked to many who
> wanted to participate in the web tooling project. The initial interest
> seems to be in a few areas:
> 1. server tooling - an application runtime neutral abstraction for
> launching/debugging/... servers.
> 2. support for editing and developing web artifacts (xml, html, jsp, ...).
> The initial comments appear to be related to source editing, although I have
> heard some interest in providing source editing. There is some related
> enabling work in the platform that will hopefully make this easier to do and
> the results better.
> 3. project "definition". How do we preserve flexible layout of web
> projects? How do we use project natures? etc.
> 4. j2ee models. In order to address many interesting problems, you need a
> model to talk to. We need a common j2ee model to be able to build
> interesting tools.
>
> Now for a few questions:
> 1. Are you interested in contributing in the above areas? (details?)
> 2. Are there areas that are missing from the above that you would like to
> contribute in?
>
> Some informal offers for contribution have already been made. As we
> understand the areas better, we need to collect contributions in them so we
> can choose the best starting points. We are not looking for a "product"
> level contribution, rather, we want contributions that correspond to the
> areas (as we together enumerate them). (It is ok for you to provide multiple
> contributions - we just don't want to think of them as a single proposal.)
I am already working on number 2. (http://sourceforge.net/projects/jseditor)
FYI, I did my BCS at Carleton and did a workterm at OTI in '96
--
Alex Fitzpatrick
Will code for food.
Cognos Inc.
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions [message #3932 is a reply to message #3891] |
Tue, 17 June 2003 13:00 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mjasnows.bea.com
I would be interested in contributing to #2 (support for editing/developing
web artifacts).
Also, what about visualization features around editing, navigating a J2EE
model, etc...?
Thanks,
Mike Jasnowski
"John Wiegand" <john_wiegand@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:bcl685$p2f$1@rogue.oti.com...
> We had a good turnout at the Eclipse BoF at JavaOne. I talked to many who
> wanted to participate in the web tooling project. The initial interest
> seems to be in a few areas:
> 1. server tooling - an application runtime neutral abstraction for
> launching/debugging/... servers.
> 2. support for editing and developing web artifacts (xml, html, jsp, ...).
> The initial comments appear to be related to source editing, although I
have
> heard some interest in providing source editing. There is some related
> enabling work in the platform that will hopefully make this easier to do
and
> the results better.
> 3. project "definition". How do we preserve flexible layout of web
> projects? How do we use project natures? etc.
> 4. j2ee models. In order to address many interesting problems, you need a
> model to talk to. We need a common j2ee model to be able to build
> interesting tools.
>
> Now for a few questions:
> 1. Are you interested in contributing in the above areas? (details?)
> 2. Are there areas that are missing from the above that you would like to
> contribute in?
>
> Some informal offers for contribution have already been made. As we
> understand the areas better, we need to collect contributions in them so
we
> can choose the best starting points. We are not looking for a "product"
> level contribution, rather, we want contributions that correspond to the
> areas (as we together enumerate them). (It is ok for you to provide
multiple
> contributions - we just don't want to think of them as a single proposal.)
>
> John
>
> PS: Just to make matters more interesting, I will be relocating over the
> next few weeks (from Minnesota to Oregon). So please don't (directly)
> correlate my response time with the content of your message...
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions [message #3938 is a reply to message #3891] |
Wed, 18 June 2003 07:58 |
Kevin Duffey
Messages: 304
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Does any of this have to do with the whole myeclipseide.net thing? They seem
to be doing the same thing, putting together various tools plugins like
this, such as the EASIE j2ee plugin, jsp/web page tools, etc. For $29 a
year, that isn't all that bad, but I am curious if the web tools is similar,
part of it, etc?
"John Wiegand" <john_wiegand@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:bcl685$p2f$1@rogue.oti.com...
> We had a good turnout at the Eclipse BoF at JavaOne. I talked to many who
> wanted to participate in the web tooling project. The initial interest
> seems to be in a few areas:
> 1. server tooling - an application runtime neutral abstraction for
> launching/debugging/... servers.
> 2. support for editing and developing web artifacts (xml, html, jsp, ...).
> The initial comments appear to be related to source editing, although I
have
> heard some interest in providing source editing. There is some related
> enabling work in the platform that will hopefully make this easier to do
and
> the results better.
> 3. project "definition". How do we preserve flexible layout of web
> projects? How do we use project natures? etc.
> 4. j2ee models. In order to address many interesting problems, you need a
> model to talk to. We need a common j2ee model to be able to build
> interesting tools.
>
> Now for a few questions:
> 1. Are you interested in contributing in the above areas? (details?)
> 2. Are there areas that are missing from the above that you would like to
> contribute in?
>
> Some informal offers for contribution have already been made. As we
> understand the areas better, we need to collect contributions in them so
we
> can choose the best starting points. We are not looking for a "product"
> level contribution, rather, we want contributions that correspond to the
> areas (as we together enumerate them). (It is ok for you to provide
multiple
> contributions - we just don't want to think of them as a single proposal.)
>
> John
>
> PS: Just to make matters more interesting, I will be relocating over the
> next few weeks (from Minnesota to Oregon). So please don't (directly)
> correlate my response time with the content of your message...
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions [message #3960 is a reply to message #3938] |
Wed, 18 June 2003 21:10 |
Todd E. Williams
Messages: 54
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
A reply to this question has been posted as it's own thread, titled
"Relationship between MyEclipse and the Web Tools Project"
"Kevin" <supreme_java_guru_1@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bcp694$2pf$1@rogue.oti.com...
> Does any of this have to do with the whole myeclipseide.net thing? They
seem
> to be doing the same thing, putting together various tools plugins like
> this, such as the EASIE j2ee plugin, jsp/web page tools, etc. For $29 a
> year, that isn't all that bad, but I am curious if the web tools is
similar,
> part of it, etc?
>
> "John Wiegand" <john_wiegand@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
> news:bcl685$p2f$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > We had a good turnout at the Eclipse BoF at JavaOne. I talked to many
who
> > wanted to participate in the web tooling project. The initial interest
> > seems to be in a few areas:
> > 1. server tooling - an application runtime neutral abstraction for
> > launching/debugging/... servers.
> > 2. support for editing and developing web artifacts (xml, html, jsp,
....).
> > The initial comments appear to be related to source editing, although I
> have
> > heard some interest in providing source editing. There is some related
> > enabling work in the platform that will hopefully make this easier to do
> and
> > the results better.
> > 3. project "definition". How do we preserve flexible layout of web
> > projects? How do we use project natures? etc.
> > 4. j2ee models. In order to address many interesting problems, you need
a
> > model to talk to. We need a common j2ee model to be able to build
> > interesting tools.
> >
> > Now for a few questions:
> > 1. Are you interested in contributing in the above areas? (details?)
> > 2. Are there areas that are missing from the above that you would like
to
> > contribute in?
> >
> > Some informal offers for contribution have already been made. As we
> > understand the areas better, we need to collect contributions in them so
> we
> > can choose the best starting points. We are not looking for a "product"
> > level contribution, rather, we want contributions that correspond to the
> > areas (as we together enumerate them). (It is ok for you to provide
> multiple
> > contributions - we just don't want to think of them as a single
proposal.)
> >
> > John
> >
> > PS: Just to make matters more interesting, I will be relocating over the
> > next few weeks (from Minnesota to Oregon). So please don't (directly)
> > correlate my response time with the content of your message...
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions (WSAD participation) [message #4604 is a reply to message #3891] |
Thu, 19 June 2003 18:04 |
Scott Rich
Messages: 1
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
"John Wiegand" <john_wiegand@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:bcl685$p2f$1@rogue.oti.com...
> We had a good turnout at the Eclipse BoF at JavaOne. I talked to many who
> wanted to participate in the web tooling project. The initial interest
> seems to be in a few areas:
> 1. server tooling - an application runtime neutral abstraction for
> launching/debugging/... servers.
> 2. support for editing and developing web artifacts (xml, html, jsp, ...).
> The initial comments appear to be related to source editing, although I
have
> heard some interest in providing source editing. There is some related
> enabling work in the platform that will hopefully make this easier to do
and
> the results better.
> 3. project "definition". How do we preserve flexible layout of web
> projects? How do we use project natures? etc.
> 4. j2ee models. In order to address many interesting problems, you need a
> model to talk to. We need a common j2ee model to be able to build
> interesting tools.
>
> Now for a few questions:
> 1. Are you interested in contributing in the above areas? (details?)
> 2. Are there areas that are missing from the above that you would like to
> contribute in?
>
> Some informal offers for contribution have already been made. As we
> understand the areas better, we need to collect contributions in them so
we
> can choose the best starting points. We are not looking for a "product"
> level contribution, rather, we want contributions that correspond to the
> areas (as we together enumerate them). (It is ok for you to provide
multiple
> contributions - we just don't want to think of them as a single proposal.)
>
> John
>
> PS: Just to make matters more interesting, I will be relocating over the
> next few weeks (from Minnesota to Oregon). So please don't (directly)
> correlate my response time with the content of your message...
>
>
John,
As we discussed at JavaOne, I am very excited about the launch of the Web
Tools project. The WSAD team will be participating, and we would like to
contribute some of our components for consideration. We definitely intend
to offer our server tooling, and look forward to working with Todd and
others on their ideas in that area. We have other components which fit the
roadmap you describe above, and would like to talk about those, too.
Once we get beyond the plumbing you describe above, I think some Web
Services tools would be appropriate.
Thanks for kicking this off, I think this really is an important next step
for Eclipse and the Java/J2EE community in general.
Scott Rich
IBM WebSphere Studio Tools
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions (WSAD participation) [message #4673 is a reply to message #4604] |
Fri, 20 June 2003 14:26 |
Naci Dai
Messages: 11
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
As the director of the ObjectLearn group and Lomboz. I would think that
WSAD tools are REAL products compared to anything else, including Lomboz.
It would be the best thing that can ever happen to webtools and eclipse if
some of these tools are made public via this project.
Although an optimist by nature, I truly suspect that this project will not
fulfill its true potential without IBM/OTI sponsorships and contributions
simply because of the amount of dedication, both personal and financial, it
requires is beyond the reach of individuals. Once the initial tools are in
place, it can probably be maintained on a more voluntary basis.
I am also disturbed slightly to see undercurrents in this newsgroup to force
this project into directions that conflict with the spirit of open source,
if there is a better way to do things or ways to fix it, package it,
contribute it back to open source.... but those things have a way of ironing
themselves out, I am sure PMC will watch it.
As for lomboz we do not know what to make of this since there is significant
overlap. Donating the source is not too feasible as it may bias the design
and it is NOT rocket science (I am serious :-). We will definitely
contribute at least our experience, but it is not obvious how (John are you
listening?).
We are also running a survey to decide what to do with Lomboz. Now that
making it an eclipse project is out of the question, we will probably host
it on sourceforge and open the source. We will also continue to develop it
just because it is fun. And, as long as there are people who use it, maybe
we will challenge webtools a bit so that all things get better :-)
Naci
"Scott Rich" <srich@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:bcstqq$9jk$1@rogue.oti.com...
>
> "John Wiegand" <john_wiegand@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
> news:bcl685$p2f$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > We had a good turnout at the Eclipse BoF at JavaOne. I talked to many
who
> > wanted to participate in the web tooling project. The initial interest
> > seems to be in a few areas:
> > 1. server tooling - an application runtime neutral abstraction for
> > launching/debugging/... servers.
> > 2. support for editing and developing web artifacts (xml, html, jsp,
....).
> > The initial comments appear to be related to source editing, although I
> have
> > heard some interest in providing source editing. There is some related
> > enabling work in the platform that will hopefully make this easier to do
> and
> > the results better.
> > 3. project "definition". How do we preserve flexible layout of web
> > projects? How do we use project natures? etc.
> > 4. j2ee models. In order to address many interesting problems, you need
a
> > model to talk to. We need a common j2ee model to be able to build
> > interesting tools.
> >
> > Now for a few questions:
> > 1. Are you interested in contributing in the above areas? (details?)
> > 2. Are there areas that are missing from the above that you would like
to
> > contribute in?
> >
> > Some informal offers for contribution have already been made. As we
> > understand the areas better, we need to collect contributions in them so
> we
> > can choose the best starting points. We are not looking for a "product"
> > level contribution, rather, we want contributions that correspond to the
> > areas (as we together enumerate them). (It is ok for you to provide
> multiple
> > contributions - we just don't want to think of them as a single
proposal.)
> >
> > John
> >
> > PS: Just to make matters more interesting, I will be relocating over the
> > next few weeks (from Minnesota to Oregon). So please don't (directly)
> > correlate my response time with the content of your message...
> >
> >
>
> John,
> As we discussed at JavaOne, I am very excited about the launch of the Web
> Tools project. The WSAD team will be participating, and we would like to
> contribute some of our components for consideration. We definitely intend
> to offer our server tooling, and look forward to working with Todd and
> others on their ideas in that area. We have other components which fit
the
> roadmap you describe above, and would like to talk about those, too.
>
> Once we get beyond the plumbing you describe above, I think some Web
> Services tools would be appropriate.
>
> Thanks for kicking this off, I think this really is an important next step
> for Eclipse and the Java/J2EE community in general.
>
> Scott Rich
> IBM WebSphere Studio Tools
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions (WSAD participation) [message #4743 is a reply to message #4673] |
Fri, 20 June 2003 14:44 |
John Wiegand
Messages: 7
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Naci -
I am listening to (and appreciating) your offer to provide experience, and
hopefully more - we need developers to move whatever initial contribution we
base our work on forward.Once we have some code contributions on the table
(this will take a few weeks), we ALL need to review what we have and
determine how we need to evolve from the initial state.
The good news is that we don't need to have all of the contributions up
front. In fact, we are better off if we are only looking at one or two
areas at a time as we get going.
John
"Naci Dai" <nacidai@acm.org> wrote in message
news:bcv5jm$rji$1@rogue.oti.com...
> As the director of the ObjectLearn group and Lomboz. I would think that
> WSAD tools are REAL products compared to anything else, including Lomboz.
>
> It would be the best thing that can ever happen to webtools and eclipse if
> some of these tools are made public via this project.
>
> Although an optimist by nature, I truly suspect that this project will
not
> fulfill its true potential without IBM/OTI sponsorships and contributions
> simply because of the amount of dedication, both personal and financial,
it
> requires is beyond the reach of individuals. Once the initial tools are
in
> place, it can probably be maintained on a more voluntary basis.
>
> I am also disturbed slightly to see undercurrents in this newsgroup to
force
> this project into directions that conflict with the spirit of open source,
> if there is a better way to do things or ways to fix it, package it,
> contribute it back to open source.... but those things have a way of
ironing
> themselves out, I am sure PMC will watch it.
>
> As for lomboz we do not know what to make of this since there is
significant
> overlap. Donating the source is not too feasible as it may bias the
design
> and it is NOT rocket science (I am serious :-). We will definitely
> contribute at least our experience, but it is not obvious how (John are
you
> listening?).
>
> We are also running a survey to decide what to do with Lomboz. Now that
> making it an eclipse project is out of the question, we will probably host
> it on sourceforge and open the source. We will also continue to develop
it
> just because it is fun. And, as long as there are people who use it,
maybe
> we will challenge webtools a bit so that all things get better :-)
>
> Naci
>
> "Scott Rich" <srich@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
> news:bcstqq$9jk$1@rogue.oti.com...
> >
> > "John Wiegand" <john_wiegand@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
> > news:bcl685$p2f$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > > We had a good turnout at the Eclipse BoF at JavaOne. I talked to many
> who
> > > wanted to participate in the web tooling project. The initial
interest
> > > seems to be in a few areas:
> > > 1. server tooling - an application runtime neutral abstraction for
> > > launching/debugging/... servers.
> > > 2. support for editing and developing web artifacts (xml, html, jsp,
> ...).
> > > The initial comments appear to be related to source editing, although
I
> > have
> > > heard some interest in providing source editing. There is some
related
> > > enabling work in the platform that will hopefully make this easier to
do
> > and
> > > the results better.
> > > 3. project "definition". How do we preserve flexible layout of web
> > > projects? How do we use project natures? etc.
> > > 4. j2ee models. In order to address many interesting problems, you
need
> a
> > > model to talk to. We need a common j2ee model to be able to build
> > > interesting tools.
> > >
> > > Now for a few questions:
> > > 1. Are you interested in contributing in the above areas? (details?)
> > > 2. Are there areas that are missing from the above that you would like
> to
> > > contribute in?
> > >
> > > Some informal offers for contribution have already been made. As we
> > > understand the areas better, we need to collect contributions in them
so
> > we
> > > can choose the best starting points. We are not looking for a
"product"
> > > level contribution, rather, we want contributions that correspond to
the
> > > areas (as we together enumerate them). (It is ok for you to provide
> > multiple
> > > contributions - we just don't want to think of them as a single
> proposal.)
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > PS: Just to make matters more interesting, I will be relocating over
the
> > > next few weeks (from Minnesota to Oregon). So please don't
(directly)
> > > correlate my response time with the content of your message...
> > >
> > >
> >
> > John,
> > As we discussed at JavaOne, I am very excited about the launch of the
Web
> > Tools project. The WSAD team will be participating, and we would like
to
> > contribute some of our components for consideration. We definitely
intend
> > to offer our server tooling, and look forward to working with Todd and
> > others on their ideas in that area. We have other components which fit
> the
> > roadmap you describe above, and would like to talk about those, too.
> >
> > Once we get beyond the plumbing you describe above, I think some Web
> > Services tools would be appropriate.
> >
> > Thanks for kicking this off, I think this really is an important next
step
> > for Eclipse and the Java/J2EE community in general.
> >
> > Scott Rich
> > IBM WebSphere Studio Tools
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions [message #5159 is a reply to message #3891] |
Sun, 22 June 2003 13:06 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: cecconae.ig.com.br
John Wiegand wrote:
> We had a good turnout at the Eclipse BoF at JavaOne. I talked to many who
> wanted to participate in the web tooling project. The initial interest
> seems to be in a few areas:
> 1. server tooling - an application runtime neutral abstraction for
> launching/debugging/... servers.
> 2. support for editing and developing web artifacts (xml, html, jsp, ...).
> The initial comments appear to be related to source editing, although I have
> heard some interest in providing source editing. There is some related
> enabling work in the platform that will hopefully make this easier to do and
> the results better.
> 3. project "definition". How do we preserve flexible layout of web
> projects? How do we use project natures? etc.
> 4. j2ee models. In order to address many interesting problems, you need a
> model to talk to. We need a common j2ee model to be able to build
> interesting tools.
> Now for a few questions:
> 1. Are you interested in contributing in the above areas? (details?)
> 2. Are there areas that are missing from the above that you would like to
> contribute in?
> Some informal offers for contribution have already been made. As we
> understand the areas better, we need to collect contributions in them so we
> can choose the best starting points. We are not looking for a "product"
> level contribution, rather, we want contributions that correspond to the
> areas (as we together enumerate them). (It is ok for you to provide multiple
> contributions - we just don't want to think of them as a single proposal.)
> John
> PS: Just to make matters more interesting, I will be relocating over the
> next few weeks (from Minnesota to Oregon). So please don't (directly)
> correlate my response time with the content of your message...
Hi John,
I the past six months I´ve been writing wdt and sct, Web Development
Toolkit and Server Control Toolkit. Bellow I describe some parts already
done :
1- J2EE Web Project Wizard.
2- J2EE Web Perspective.
3- J2EE Web Project Explorer.
4- Server Control Perspective.
5- Server Control View ( Start, Stop, Restart, Publish ).
With that experience I would like to participate in any areas where I
could
contribute to enhance Eclipse IDE. My experience with programming is
almost
fifteen years
Sincerely,
Antonio Edson Ceccon
email- cecconae@ig.com.br
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions [message #5437 is a reply to message #5159] |
Tue, 24 June 2003 20:14 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: rafal.krzewski.caltha.pl
> Hi John,
>
> I the past six months I´ve been writing wdt and sct, Web Development
> Toolkit and Server Control Toolkit. Bellow I describe some parts already
> done :
>
> 1- J2EE Web Project Wizard.
> 2- J2EE Web Perspective.
> 3- J2EE Web Project Explorer.
>
> 4- Server Control Perspective.
> 5- Server Control View ( Start, Stop, Restart, Publish ).
This is very interesting, can you describe these parts in greater
detail? Also, are these toolkits freely available? If yes, can you
provide some URLs? If not, do you have any plans for opening them up?
Either way, your experience in this subject you decide to share with
us will be greatly appreciated.
R.
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse BoF summary (JavaOne) / questions [message #5457 is a reply to message #5437] |
Thu, 26 June 2003 21:20 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: cecconae.ig.com.br
Rafal Krzewski wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > I the past six months I´ve been writing wdt and sct, Web Development
> > Toolkit and Server Control Toolkit. Bellow I describe some parts already
> > done :
> >
> > 1- J2EE Web Project Wizard.
> > 2- J2EE Web Perspective.
> > 3- J2EE Web Project Explorer.
> >
> > 4- Server Control Perspective.
> > 5- Server Control View ( Start, Stop, Restart, Publish ).
> This is very interesting, can you describe these parts in greater
> detail? Also, are these toolkits freely available? If yes, can you
> provide some URLs? If not, do you have any plans for opening them up?
> Either way, your experience in this subject you decide to share with
> us will be greatly appreciated.
> R.
I am finishing them, after that I intend to put in a free
source project. I´ll send more informations about them to your
email next weekend.
Regards,
Antonio
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Dec 21 17:03:20 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03569 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
