|
| Re: Now that 3.0 is almost done and RCP is there, is there an equinox? [message #42552 is a reply to message #42520] |
Tue, 25 May 2004 23:58   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: pascal.ibm.canada
A lot of things separate equinox from RCP, in that equinox was a
playground to try new runtime things.
Like the initial plan indicated it, most of the things that worth it
have been contributed back to eclipse in a form or in another.
PaScaL
Kevin wrote:
> I am not sure what separates the equinox project from 3.0/RCP...is there any
> difference now? IS equinox moved in to 3.0 branch and no longer a separate
> project?
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Now that 3.0 is almost done and RCP is there, is there an equinox? [message #43993 is a reply to message #42552] |
Mon, 28 June 2004 19:48 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: jeff_mcaffer.REMOVE.ca.ibm.com
Equinox was conceived and executed as an incubator for runtime technology in
Eclipse. There are many open questions remaining. For example, security,
scalability and dynamic behaviour. There are people lining up to work on
various aspects of these so the current plan is to keep Equinox alive. To
date the model has worked quite well.
Jeff
"Pascal Rapicault" <pascal@ibm.canada> wrote in message
news:c90m58$63v$1@eclipse.org...
> A lot of things separate equinox from RCP, in that equinox was a
> playground to try new runtime things.
>
> Like the initial plan indicated it, most of the things that worth it
> have been contributed back to eclipse in a form or in another.
>
> PaScaL
>
> Kevin wrote:
> > I am not sure what separates the equinox project from 3.0/RCP...is there
any
> > difference now? IS equinox moved in to 3.0 branch and no longer a
separate
> > project?
> >
> >
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02674 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
