Home » Modeling » GMF (Graphical Modeling Framework) » Alternative template technology in GMF
| | | | |
| Re: Alternative template technology in GMF [message #38334 is a reply to message #38268] |
Mon, 04 September 2006 08:43   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thanks Ed,
thats exactly why I asked ;-)
Regards,
Jan
Ed Merks schrieb:
> Artem,
>
> It would seem odd if Europa has dependencies on things not in Europa.
> I.e., I think most folks would expect Europa to be a complete dependency
> closure, so unless the dependency is optional, I think folks will expect
> it to be included...
>
>
> Artem Tikhomirov wrote:
>> I guess the answer is no, though I'd better ask oaw guys instead.
>>
>> "Jan Lohre" <jan.lohre@web.de> wrote in message
>> news:edh24a$v9h$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>>
>>> Hi Artem,
>>>
>>> does that mean the oAW team will join the Europa release?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> Artem Tikhomirov schrieb:
>>>
>>>> We are looking forward to use Xpand template language from oAW
>>>> (eclipse.org/gmt/oaw) as an alternative for JET. Hope, we'll introduce it
>>>> in few weeks.
>>>>
>>>> Partial list of JET limitations is here
>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=151911
>>>>
>>>> Artem
>>>>
>>>> "âÕÛÕÅ×" <jnbu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:pan.2006.09.03.21.20.50.375089@yahoo.com...
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> In http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/GMF_GenModel#Code_Generati on it is
>>>>> said that
>>>>>
>>>>> Some refactoring is expected in this area, as is the potential to
>>>>> leverage
>>>>> an alternative template technology.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anybody know something about this 'alternative template
>>>>> technology', when the refactoring is to take place and what's wrong
>>>>> jet?
>>>>>
>>>>> wbr, eugen.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Alternative template technology in GMF [message #38531 is a reply to message #38334] |
Mon, 04 September 2006 10:54 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I misunderstood the question. Definitely, we are not going to introduce
dependencies that are not part of Europa.
Artem
"Jan Lohre" <jan.lohre@web.de> wrote in message
news:edh721$s89$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Thanks Ed,
>
> thats exactly why I asked ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Jan
>
> Ed Merks schrieb:
>> Artem,
>>
>> It would seem odd if Europa has dependencies on things not in Europa.
>> I.e., I think most folks would expect Europa to be a complete dependency
>> closure, so unless the dependency is optional, I think folks will expect
>> it to be included...
>>
>>
>> Artem Tikhomirov wrote:
>>> I guess the answer is no, though I'd better ask oaw guys instead.
>>>
>>> "Jan Lohre" <jan.lohre@web.de> wrote in message
>>> news:edh24a$v9h$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>>>
>>>> Hi Artem,
>>>>
>>>> does that mean the oAW team will join the Europa release?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>> Artem Tikhomirov schrieb:
>>>>
>>>>> We are looking forward to use Xpand template language from oAW
>>>>> (eclipse.org/gmt/oaw) as an alternative for JET. Hope, we'll introduce
>>>>> it in few weeks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Partial list of JET limitations is here
>>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=151911
>>>>>
>>>>> Artem
>>>>>
>>>>> "
|
|
|
| Re: Alternative template technology in GMF [message #38699 is a reply to message #38531] |
Mon, 04 September 2006 11:34 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Artem,
mmh. Maybe I just don't get the point, but how are going to use XPand
instead of JET without depending on oAW?
Regards,
Jan
Artem Tikhomirov schrieb:
> I misunderstood the question. Definitely, we are not going to introduce
> dependencies that are not part of Europa.
>
> Artem
>
> "Jan Lohre" <jan.lohre@web.de> wrote in message
> news:edh721$s89$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>> Thanks Ed,
>>
>> thats exactly why I asked ;-)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jan
>>
>> Ed Merks schrieb:
>>> Artem,
>>>
>>> It would seem odd if Europa has dependencies on things not in Europa.
>>> I.e., I think most folks would expect Europa to be a complete dependency
>>> closure, so unless the dependency is optional, I think folks will expect
>>> it to be included...
>>>
>>>
>>> Artem Tikhomirov wrote:
>>>> I guess the answer is no, though I'd better ask oaw guys instead.
>>>>
>>>> "Jan Lohre" <jan.lohre@web.de> wrote in message
>>>> news:edh24a$v9h$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Artem,
>>>>>
>>>>> does that mean the oAW team will join the Europa release?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Jan
>>>>>
>>>>> Artem Tikhomirov schrieb:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We are looking forward to use Xpand template language from oAW
>>>>>> (eclipse.org/gmt/oaw) as an alternative for JET. Hope, we'll introduce
>>>>>> it in few weeks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Partial list of JET limitations is here
>>>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=151911
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Artem
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "âÕÛÕÅ×" <jnbu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:pan.2006.09.03.21.20.50.375089@yahoo.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/GMF_GenModel#Code_Generati on it
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> said that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some refactoring is expected in this area, as is the potential to
>>>>>>> leverage
>>>>>>> an alternative template technology.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does anybody know something about this 'alternative template
>>>>>>> technology', when the refactoring is to take place and what's wrong
>>>>>>> jet?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wbr, eugen.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Alternative template technology in GMF [message #38801 is a reply to message #38699] |
Mon, 04 September 2006 11:48 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Magic :)
Take a look at the thread
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/modeling-pmc/msg00073.h tml
Artem
"Jan Lohre" <jan.lohre@web.de> wrote in message
news:edhh2t$nbv$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Hi Artem,
>
> mmh. Maybe I just don't get the point, but how are going to use XPand
> instead of JET without depending on oAW?
>
> Regards,
> Jan
>
> Artem Tikhomirov schrieb:
>> I misunderstood the question. Definitely, we are not going to introduce
>> dependencies that are not part of Europa.
>>
>> Artem
>>
>> "Jan Lohre" <jan.lohre@web.de> wrote in message
>> news:edh721$s89$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>>> Thanks Ed,
>>>
>>> thats exactly why I asked ;-)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> Ed Merks schrieb:
>>>> Artem,
>>>>
>>>> It would seem odd if Europa has dependencies on things not in Europa.
>>>> I.e., I think most folks would expect Europa to be a complete
>>>> dependency closure, so unless the dependency is optional, I think folks
>>>> will expect it to be included...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Artem Tikhomirov wrote:
>>>>> I guess the answer is no, though I'd better ask oaw guys instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Jan Lohre" <jan.lohre@web.de> wrote in message
>>>>> news:edh24a$v9h$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Artem,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> does that mean the oAW team will join the Europa release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Artem Tikhomirov schrieb:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are looking forward to use Xpand template language from oAW
>>>>>>> (eclipse.org/gmt/oaw) as an alternative for JET. Hope, we'll
>>>>>>> introduce it in few weeks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Partial list of JET limitations is here
>>>>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=151911
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Artem
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "
|
|
|
| Re: Alternative template technology in GMF [message #39072 is a reply to message #38801] |
Tue, 05 September 2006 06:01 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Artem,
thanks for clarification, I love magic ;-)
Regards,
Jan
Artem Tikhomirov schrieb:
> Magic :)
>
> Take a look at the thread
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/modeling-pmc/msg00073.h tml
>
> Artem
>
> "Jan Lohre" <jan.lohre@web.de> wrote in message
> news:edhh2t$nbv$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>> Hi Artem,
>>
>> mmh. Maybe I just don't get the point, but how are going to use XPand
>> instead of JET without depending on oAW?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jan
>>
>> Artem Tikhomirov schrieb:
>>> I misunderstood the question. Definitely, we are not going to introduce
>>> dependencies that are not part of Europa.
>>>
>>> Artem
>>>
>>> "Jan Lohre" <jan.lohre@web.de> wrote in message
>>> news:edh721$s89$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>>>> Thanks Ed,
>>>>
>>>> thats exactly why I asked ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>> Ed Merks schrieb:
>>>>> Artem,
>>>>>
>>>>> It would seem odd if Europa has dependencies on things not in Europa.
>>>>> I.e., I think most folks would expect Europa to be a complete
>>>>> dependency closure, so unless the dependency is optional, I think folks
>>>>> will expect it to be included...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Artem Tikhomirov wrote:
>>>>>> I guess the answer is no, though I'd better ask oaw guys instead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Jan Lohre" <jan.lohre@web.de> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:edh24a$v9h$1@utils.eclipse.org...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Artem,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> does that mean the oAW team will join the Europa release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Artem Tikhomirov schrieb:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are looking forward to use Xpand template language from oAW
>>>>>>>> (eclipse.org/gmt/oaw) as an alternative for JET. Hope, we'll
>>>>>>>> introduce it in few weeks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Partial list of JET limitations is here
>>>>>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=151911
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Artem
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "âÕÛÕÅ×" <jnbu@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:pan.2006.09.03.21.20.50.375089@yahoo.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/GMF_GenModel#Code_Generati on
>>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>>> said that
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some refactoring is expected in this area, as is the potential to
>>>>>>>>> leverage
>>>>>>>>> an alternative template technology.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does anybody know something about this 'alternative template
>>>>>>>>> technology', when the refactoring is to take place and what's wrong
>>>>>>>>> jet?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wbr, eugen.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Apr 25 21:23:07 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03472 seconds |
Home