|
Re: Does BIRT 2.2 support "named" parameters of data sets? [message #338796 is a reply to message #326464] |
Tue, 29 January 2008 02:05 |
Linda Chan Messages: 845 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Maged,
Support of "named" parameters defined by an ODA driver has been added since
BIRT 2.2.1.
See the comments in Bugzilla
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=122194#c7 on the specifics.
Linda
"Maged Elaasar" <melaasar@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:fncuj9$9dh$1@build.eclipse.org...
>I saw a few postings in the newsgroup about this with no direct answer. Is
>there a way in BIRT 2.2 to use named parameters in data sets? The APIs and
>the help pages imply it is doable, but when I tried to do it in my custom
>ODA driver, the parameters are only bound by "position" and not "name" in
>the query implementation. The only work around i could think of is to ask
>the user to use a naming convention in naming the params (that include the
>position) like "param1, param2...etc", which is ugly. If there is right way
>to do this properly? If not, is it scheduled to be done in an upcoming
>version of BIRT? I appreciate your help.
>
> Maged
>
|
|
|
Re: Does BIRT 2.2 support "named" parameters of data sets? [message #338871 is a reply to message #326464] |
Tue, 29 January 2008 02:05 |
Linda Chan Messages: 845 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Maged,
Support of "named" parameters defined by an ODA driver has been added since
BIRT 2.2.1.
See the comments in Bugzilla
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=122194#c7 on the specifics.
Linda
"Maged Elaasar" <melaasar@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:fncuj9$9dh$1@build.eclipse.org...
>I saw a few postings in the newsgroup about this with no direct answer. Is
>there a way in BIRT 2.2 to use named parameters in data sets? The APIs and
>the help pages imply it is doable, but when I tried to do it in my custom
>ODA driver, the parameters are only bound by "position" and not "name" in
>the query implementation. The only work around i could think of is to ask
>the user to use a naming convention in naming the params (that include the
>position) like "param1, param2...etc", which is ugly. If there is right way
>to do this properly? If not, is it scheduled to be done in an upcoming
>version of BIRT? I appreciate your help.
>
> Maged
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04634 seconds