Hi guys,
Well, option #2 sounds the most
reasonable given the circumstances but Spagic and eBPM
should really migrate soon to the new Mangrove code base.
It’s been a few months already that the new code-base is
in place and I’m worried that if we keep using the old one
they might get a bit more disconnected and will require
some work to reconcile later. So Andrea, can you let me
know what the migration plans are to move to Mangrove?
Cheers,
Adrian.
I like option #2.
Any objections?
Wayne
On 06/14/2011 03:53 AM, Andrea Zoppello wrote:
Hi Wayne,
As you remark in your message, some STP components are still
active.
For example the "Intermediate Model project" located at:
svn+ssh://dev.eclipse.org/svnroot/stp/org.eclipse.stp.intermediate-model/org.eclipse.stp.model
is still used by eBPM project ( and of course the Spagic
project ), and at the moment we've not yet made a plan to
move to SOA Mangrove Project.
So for me it's not a problem to terminate the STP project
itself, but we need to provide a way to mantain the
old codebase.
We need to define which is the best way to do that.
Here's two proposals:
1) Ok to terminate the stp project but still ensure access
to the 'old' svn repositories at least for Intermediate
Model
2) Another option ( as i know probably only ebpm is still
interested in stp im ) is to move the existing project to
the ebpm
project repository, in that case the old stp intermediate
model stuff, will be mantained by ebpm committers and
mantained within ebpm project..
Any thoughs??
Let me know which is way you prefer to proceed.
Best regards
Andrea Zoppello
Il 13/06/2011 21:07, Wayne Beaton ha scritto:
Hey folks. It's time to terminate STP.
I've started a wiki page to capture what needs to be done.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/STP/Termination_Review
It turns out that there are a handful of active projects that are marked
as "components" in the foundation database that we need to sort out what
to do with.
I also noticed that some commits are being registered against some of
these projects; this could be old metadata from the STP project making
bogus claims. Or it could be people still committing against those
projects. Whatever the case, I'd like to resolve it.
Please take a look at the wiki page and help me resolve what needs resolvin'
Please feel free to make edits/additions to the page as you see fit.
I'd really like to at least initiate the review by the end of the month.
We can queue up the action items as part of that review.
Thanks,
Wayne
_______________________________________________
soa-pmc mailing list
soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc
--
Andrea Zoppello
Spagic Architect
|
Respect the environment. Please don't print
this e-mail unless you really need to.
|
The information transmitted is intended only for the
person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking
of any action in reliance upon, this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact
the sender and delete the material from any computer.
_______________________________________________
soa-pmc mailing list
soa-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/soa-pmc