Home » Archived » XML Schema Definition (XSD) » Castor vs. XSD?
| Castor vs. XSD? [message #66019] |
Sat, 11 February 2006 10:51  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vgv8.yahoo.com.br
Hi, all,
Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD
framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor
functionalities
Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application
(workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I do
not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that is,
workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, palettes
definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM
engine) using EMF/GEF
Guennadi Vanine
|
|
|
| errata [message #66041 is a reply to message #66019] |
Sat, 11 February 2006 17:27  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vgv8.yahoo.com.br
Sorry, Castor is from
http://www.castor.org
not from Apache
Guennadi Vanine
"Guennadi Vanine" <vgv8@yahoo.com.br> wrote in message
news:dsl15t$cm$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Hi, all,
> Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD
> framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor
> functionalities
>
> Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application
> (workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I do
> not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that is,
> workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML,
> palettes definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from
> server-side BPM engine) using EMF/GEF
>
> Guennadi Vanine
>
|
|
|
| Re: Castor vs. XSD? [message #66062 is a reply to message #66019] |
Mon, 13 February 2006 07:00 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000809020300000600090006
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Guennadi,
I don't think they are really comparable. XSD's purpose is to model XML
Schema, i.e., to represent XML Schema instances, whereas Castor is yet
another XML binding approach, which is more comparable to EMF's XML
Schema -> Ecore -> Java binding. If you have a schema representing the
XML syntax, you might want to following this tutorial and compare the
results to Castor's result:
http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=tutorials/xlibmod/xlibmo d.html
Guennadi Vanine wrote:
>Hi, all,
>Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD
>framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor
>functionalities
>
>Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application
>(workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I do
>not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that is,
>workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, palettes
>definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM
>engine) using EMF/GEF
>
>Guennadi Vanine
>
>
>
>
--------------000809020300000600090006
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Guennadi,<br>
<br>
I don't think they are really comparable. XSD's purpose is to model
XML Schema, i.e., to represent XML Schema instances, whereas Castor is
yet another XML binding approach, which is more comparable to EMF's
XML Schema -> Ecore -> Java binding. If you have a schema
representing the XML syntax, you might want to following this tutorial
and compare the results to Castor's result:<br>
<blockquote><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href=" http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=tutorials/xlibmod/xlibmo d.html"> http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=tutorials/xlibmod/xlibmo d.html</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Guennadi Vanine wrote:
<blockquote cite="middsl15t$cm$1@utils.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi, all,
Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD
framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor
functionalities
Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application
(workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I do
not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that is,
workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, palettes
definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM
engine) using EMF/GEF
Guennadi Vanine
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------000809020300000600090006--
|
|
|
| Re: Castor vs. XSD? [message #66082 is a reply to message #66062] |
Mon, 13 February 2006 15:45 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vgv8.yahoo.com.br
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C630DE.71A6FD40
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks, Ed,
really my question was what Eclipse frameworks would match/cover Castor.
This all very great, for developing other frameworks, and it is =
extremely developer-friendly (and even more),
but I need to provide the user of a final product (workflow designer) =
the ability to import/export custom XML formats (of created with =
existing workflow designer, wf definitions, associated data, palettes =
and elements of palettes). That is what already exist in app made in =
Swing with Castor that I should "extend" in GEG with EMF and I even do =
not see how I would simply match it in EMF/GEF.
Guennadi Vanine=20
"Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message =
news:dspsbi$7mm$1@utils.eclipse.org...
Guennadi,
I don't think they are really comparable. XSD's purpose is to model =
XML Schema, i.e., to represent XML Schema instances, whereas Castor is =
yet another XML binding approach, which is more comparable to EMF's XML =
Schema -> Ecore -> Java binding. If you have a schema representing the =
XML syntax, you might want to following this tutorial and compare the =
results to Castor's result:
http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=3Dtutorials/xlibmod/xlib mod.html
Guennadi Vanine wrote:=20
Hi, all,
Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD=20
framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor=20
functionalities
Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application=20
(workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I =
do=20
not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that =
is,=20
workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, =
palettes=20
definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM =
engine) using EMF/GEF
Guennadi Vanine=20
=20
------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C630DE.71A6FD40
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type =
content=3Dtext/html;charset=3DISO-8859-1>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY text=3D#000000 bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks, Ed,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>really my question was what Eclipse =
frameworks=20
would match/cover Castor.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>This all very great, for developing =
other=20
frameworks, and it is extremely developer-friendly (and even=20
more),</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>but I need to provide the user of a =
final product=20
(workflow designer) the ability to import/export =
custom XML=20
formats (of created with existing workflow designer, wf definitions, =
associated=20
data, palettes and elements of palettes). That is what =
already exist=20
in app made in Swing with Castor that I should "extend" in GEG with =
EMF and=20
I even do not see how I would simply match it in EMF/GEF.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Guennadi Vanine</FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Ed Merks" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com">merks@ca.ibm.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:dspsbi$7mm$1@utils.eclipse.org">news:dspsbi$7mm$1@utils.ecli=
pse.org</A>...</DIV>Guennadi,<BR><BR>I=20
don't think they are really comparable. XSD's purpose is to =
model XML=20
Schema, i.e., to represent XML Schema instances, whereas Castor is yet =
another=20
XML binding approach, which is more comparable to EMF's XML =
Schema ->=20
Ecore -> Java binding. If you have a schema representing the =
XML=20
syntax, you might want to following this tutorial and compare the =
results to=20
Castor's result:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-freetext=20
=
href=3D" http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=3Dtutorials/xlibmod/xlib mod.h=
tml"> http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=3Dtutorials/xlibmod/xlib mod.html=
</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Guennadi=20
Vanine wrote:=20
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=3Dmiddsl15t$cm$1@utils.eclipse.org type=3D"cite"><PRE =
wrap=3D"">Hi, all,
Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD=20
framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor=20
functionalities
Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application=20
(workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I =
do=20
not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that =
is,=20
workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, =
palettes=20
definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM =
engine) using EMF/GEF
Guennadi Vanine=20
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C630DE.71A6FD40--
|
|
|
| Re: Castor vs. XSD? [message #66103 is a reply to message #66082] |
Mon, 13 February 2006 15:55 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050402070608040506020502
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Guennadi,
Sorry, I have no expertise in Castor on which to draw comparisons, so I
don't know which particular features you are hoping to see. Certainly
everything you see demonstrated in the tutorial can be done
programmatically at runtime, i.e., given a schema, you'll be able to
read and write XML instances that conform it, even without generating
any code but using dynamic Ecore instead...
Guennadi Vanine wrote:
> Thanks, Ed,
> really my question was what Eclipse frameworks would match/cover Castor.
>
> This all very great, for developing other frameworks, and it is
> extremely developer-friendly (and even more),
> but I need to provide the user of a final product (workflow designer)
> the ability to import/export custom XML formats (of created with
> existing workflow designer, wf definitions, associated data, palettes
> and elements of palettes). That is what already exist in app made in
> Swing with Castor that I should "extend" in GEG with EMF and I even do
> not see how I would simply match it in EMF/GEF.
>
> Guennadi Vanine
>
> "Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com <mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com>> wrote in
> message news:dspsbi$7mm$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Guennadi,
>
> I don't think they are really comparable. XSD's purpose is to
> model XML Schema, i.e., to represent XML Schema instances, whereas
> Castor is yet another XML binding approach, which is more
> comparable to EMF's XML Schema -> Ecore -> Java binding. If you
> have a schema representing the XML syntax, you might want to
> following this tutorial and compare the results to Castor's result:
>
> http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=tutorials/xlibmod/xlibmo d.html
>
>
> Guennadi Vanine wrote:
>> Hi, all,
>> Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD
>> framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor
>> functionalities
>>
>> Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application
>> (workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I do
>> not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that is,
>> workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, palettes
>> definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM
>> engine) using EMF/GEF
>>
>> Guennadi Vanine
>>
>>
>>
>
--------------050402070608040506020502
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Guennadi,<br>
<br>
Sorry, I have no expertise in Castor on which to draw comparisons, so I
don't know which particular features you are hoping to see. Certainly
everything you see demonstrated in the tutorial can be done
programmatically at runtime, i.e., given a schema, you'll be able to
read and write XML instances that conform it, even without generating
any code but using dynamic Ecore instead...<br>
<br>
<br>
Guennadi Vanine wrote:
<blockquote cite="middsqr5i$47a$1@utils.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name="GENERATOR">
<style></style>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Thanks, Ed,</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">really my question was what Eclipse
frameworks would match/cover Castor.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">This all very great, for developing
other frameworks, and it is extremely developer-friendly (and even
more),</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">but I need to provide the user of a
final product (workflow designer) the ability to import/export
custom XML formats (of created with existing workflow designer, wf
definitions, associated data, palettes and elements of palettes). That
is what already exist in app made in Swing with Castor that I should
"extend" in GEG with EMF and I even do not see how I would simply match
it in EMF/GEF.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Guennadi Vanine</font> </div>
<blockquote
style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">
<div>"Ed Merks" <<a href="mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com">merks@ca.ibm.com</a>>
wrote in message <a href="news:dspsbi$7mm$1@utils.eclipse.org">news:dspsbi$7mm$1@utils.eclipse.org</a>...</div>
Guennadi,<br>
<br>
I don't think they are really comparable. XSD's purpose is to model
XML Schema, i.e., to represent XML Schema instances, whereas Castor is
yet another XML binding approach, which is more comparable to EMF's
XML Schema -> Ecore -> Java binding. If you have a schema
representing the XML syntax, you might want to following this tutorial
and compare the results to Castor's result:<br>
<blockquote><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href=" http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=tutorials/xlibmod/xlibmo d.html"> http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=tutorials/xlibmod/xlibmo d.html</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Guennadi Vanine wrote:
<blockquote cite="middsl15t$cm$1@utils.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi, all,
Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD
framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor
functionalities
Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application
(workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I do
not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that is,
workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, palettes
definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM
engine) using EMF/GEF
Guennadi Vanine
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------050402070608040506020502--
|
|
|
| errata [message #597566 is a reply to message #66019] |
Sat, 11 February 2006 17:27 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vgv8.yahoo.com.br
Sorry, Castor is from
http://www.castor.org
not from Apache
Guennadi Vanine
"Guennadi Vanine" <vgv8@yahoo.com.br> wrote in message
news:dsl15t$cm$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Hi, all,
> Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD
> framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor
> functionalities
>
> Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application
> (workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I do
> not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that is,
> workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML,
> palettes definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from
> server-side BPM engine) using EMF/GEF
>
> Guennadi Vanine
>
|
|
|
| Re: Castor vs. XSD? [message #597578 is a reply to message #66019] |
Mon, 13 February 2006 07:00 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000809020300000600090006
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Guennadi,
I don't think they are really comparable. XSD's purpose is to model XML
Schema, i.e., to represent XML Schema instances, whereas Castor is yet
another XML binding approach, which is more comparable to EMF's XML
Schema -> Ecore -> Java binding. If you have a schema representing the
XML syntax, you might want to following this tutorial and compare the
results to Castor's result:
http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=tutorials/xlibmod/xlibmo d.html
Guennadi Vanine wrote:
>Hi, all,
>Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD
>framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor
>functionalities
>
>Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application
>(workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I do
>not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that is,
>workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, palettes
>definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM
>engine) using EMF/GEF
>
>Guennadi Vanine
>
>
>
>
--------------000809020300000600090006
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Guennadi,<br>
<br>
I don't think they are really comparable. XSD's purpose is to model
XML Schema, i.e., to represent XML Schema instances, whereas Castor is
yet another XML binding approach, which is more comparable to EMF's
XML Schema -> Ecore -> Java binding. If you have a schema
representing the XML syntax, you might want to following this tutorial
and compare the results to Castor's result:<br>
<blockquote><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href=" http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=tutorials/xlibmod/xlibmo d.html"> http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=tutorials/xlibmod/xlibmo d.html</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Guennadi Vanine wrote:
<blockquote cite="middsl15t$cm$1@utils.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi, all,
Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD
framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor
functionalities
Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application
(workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I do
not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that is,
workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, palettes
definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM
engine) using EMF/GEF
Guennadi Vanine
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------000809020300000600090006--
|
|
|
| Re: Castor vs. XSD? [message #597587 is a reply to message #66062] |
Mon, 13 February 2006 15:45 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vgv8.yahoo.com.br
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C630DE.71A6FD40
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks, Ed,
really my question was what Eclipse frameworks would match/cover Castor.
This all very great, for developing other frameworks, and it is =
extremely developer-friendly (and even more),
but I need to provide the user of a final product (workflow designer) =
the ability to import/export custom XML formats (of created with =
existing workflow designer, wf definitions, associated data, palettes =
and elements of palettes). That is what already exist in app made in =
Swing with Castor that I should "extend" in GEG with EMF and I even do =
not see how I would simply match it in EMF/GEF.
Guennadi Vanine=20
"Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message =
news:dspsbi$7mm$1@utils.eclipse.org...
Guennadi,
I don't think they are really comparable. XSD's purpose is to model =
XML Schema, i.e., to represent XML Schema instances, whereas Castor is =
yet another XML binding approach, which is more comparable to EMF's XML =
Schema -> Ecore -> Java binding. If you have a schema representing the =
XML syntax, you might want to following this tutorial and compare the =
results to Castor's result:
http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=3Dtutorials/xlibmod/xlib mod.html
Guennadi Vanine wrote:=20
Hi, all,
Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD=20
framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor=20
functionalities
Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application=20
(workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I =
do=20
not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that =
is,=20
workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, =
palettes=20
definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM =
engine) using EMF/GEF
Guennadi Vanine=20
=20
------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C630DE.71A6FD40
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type =
content=3Dtext/html;charset=3DISO-8859-1>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY text=3D#000000 bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks, Ed,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>really my question was what Eclipse =
frameworks=20
would match/cover Castor.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>This all very great, for developing =
other=20
frameworks, and it is extremely developer-friendly (and even=20
more),</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>but I need to provide the user of a =
final product=20
(workflow designer) the ability to import/export =
custom XML=20
formats (of created with existing workflow designer, wf definitions, =
associated=20
data, palettes and elements of palettes). That is what =
already exist=20
in app made in Swing with Castor that I should "extend" in GEG with =
EMF and=20
I even do not see how I would simply match it in EMF/GEF.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Guennadi Vanine</FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Ed Merks" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com">merks@ca.ibm.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:dspsbi$7mm$1@utils.eclipse.org">news:dspsbi$7mm$1@utils.ecli=
pse.org</A>...</DIV>Guennadi,<BR><BR>I=20
don't think they are really comparable. XSD's purpose is to =
model XML=20
Schema, i.e., to represent XML Schema instances, whereas Castor is yet =
another=20
XML binding approach, which is more comparable to EMF's XML =
Schema ->=20
Ecore -> Java binding. If you have a schema representing the =
XML=20
syntax, you might want to following this tutorial and compare the =
results to=20
Castor's result:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-freetext=20
=
href=3D" http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=3Dtutorials/xlibmod/xlib mod.h=
tml"> http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=3Dtutorials/xlibmod/xlib mod.html=
</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Guennadi=20
Vanine wrote:=20
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=3Dmiddsl15t$cm$1@utils.eclipse.org type=3D"cite"><PRE =
wrap=3D"">Hi, all,
Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD=20
framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor=20
functionalities
Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application=20
(workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I =
do=20
not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that =
is,=20
workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, =
palettes=20
definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM =
engine) using EMF/GEF
Guennadi Vanine=20
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C630DE.71A6FD40--
|
|
|
| Re: Castor vs. XSD? [message #597596 is a reply to message #66082] |
Mon, 13 February 2006 15:55 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050402070608040506020502
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Guennadi,
Sorry, I have no expertise in Castor on which to draw comparisons, so I
don't know which particular features you are hoping to see. Certainly
everything you see demonstrated in the tutorial can be done
programmatically at runtime, i.e., given a schema, you'll be able to
read and write XML instances that conform it, even without generating
any code but using dynamic Ecore instead...
Guennadi Vanine wrote:
> Thanks, Ed,
> really my question was what Eclipse frameworks would match/cover Castor.
>
> This all very great, for developing other frameworks, and it is
> extremely developer-friendly (and even more),
> but I need to provide the user of a final product (workflow designer)
> the ability to import/export custom XML formats (of created with
> existing workflow designer, wf definitions, associated data, palettes
> and elements of palettes). That is what already exist in app made in
> Swing with Castor that I should "extend" in GEG with EMF and I even do
> not see how I would simply match it in EMF/GEF.
>
> Guennadi Vanine
>
> "Ed Merks" <merks@ca.ibm.com <mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com>> wrote in
> message news:dspsbi$7mm$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Guennadi,
>
> I don't think they are really comparable. XSD's purpose is to
> model XML Schema, i.e., to represent XML Schema instances, whereas
> Castor is yet another XML binding approach, which is more
> comparable to EMF's XML Schema -> Ecore -> Java binding. If you
> have a schema representing the XML syntax, you might want to
> following this tutorial and compare the results to Castor's result:
>
> http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=tutorials/xlibmod/xlibmo d.html
>
>
> Guennadi Vanine wrote:
>> Hi, all,
>> Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD
>> framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor
>> functionalities
>>
>> Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application
>> (workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I do
>> not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that is,
>> workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, palettes
>> definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM
>> engine) using EMF/GEF
>>
>> Guennadi Vanine
>>
>>
>>
>
--------------050402070608040506020502
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Guennadi,<br>
<br>
Sorry, I have no expertise in Castor on which to draw comparisons, so I
don't know which particular features you are hoping to see. Certainly
everything you see demonstrated in the tutorial can be done
programmatically at runtime, i.e., given a schema, you'll be able to
read and write XML instances that conform it, even without generating
any code but using dynamic Ecore instead...<br>
<br>
<br>
Guennadi Vanine wrote:
<blockquote cite="middsqr5i$47a$1@utils.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name="GENERATOR">
<style></style>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Thanks, Ed,</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">really my question was what Eclipse
frameworks would match/cover Castor.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">This all very great, for developing
other frameworks, and it is extremely developer-friendly (and even
more),</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">but I need to provide the user of a
final product (workflow designer) the ability to import/export
custom XML formats (of created with existing workflow designer, wf
definitions, associated data, palettes and elements of palettes). That
is what already exist in app made in Swing with Castor that I should
"extend" in GEG with EMF and I even do not see how I would simply match
it in EMF/GEF.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Guennadi Vanine</font> </div>
<blockquote
style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">
<div>"Ed Merks" <<a href="mailto:merks@ca.ibm.com">merks@ca.ibm.com</a>>
wrote in message <a href="news:dspsbi$7mm$1@utils.eclipse.org">news:dspsbi$7mm$1@utils.eclipse.org</a>...</div>
Guennadi,<br>
<br>
I don't think they are really comparable. XSD's purpose is to model
XML Schema, i.e., to represent XML Schema instances, whereas Castor is
yet another XML binding approach, which is more comparable to EMF's
XML Schema -> Ecore -> Java binding. If you have a schema
representing the XML syntax, you might want to following this tutorial
and compare the results to Castor's result:<br>
<blockquote><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href=" http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=tutorials/xlibmod/xlibmo d.html"> http://eclipse.org/emf/docs.php?doc=tutorials/xlibmod/xlibmo d.html</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Guennadi Vanine wrote:
<blockquote cite="middsl15t$cm$1@utils.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi, all,
Can anybody outline me functionalities of Apache Castor vs. Eclipse XSD
framework? or any other Eclipse frameworks covering all Apache Castor
functionalities
Or reformulating, I have the task to reimplement existing application
(workflow designer) in Swing using GEF with EMF. The problem is that I do
not see how I can match already created with Castor files in XML (that is,
workflow definitions in XML, associated with wf nodes data in XML, palettes
definitions, templates, etc. uploaded/downloaded to/from server-side BPM
engine) using EMF/GEF
Guennadi Vanine
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------050402070608040506020502--
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Nov 04 05:25:29 EST 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.10033 seconds |
Home